Re: [Libusbx-devel] usbdevfs: BULK_CONTINUATION flag does not work with XHCI controller

2012-06-03 Thread Xiaofan Chen
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 4:54 AM, Alan Stern wrote: > On Fri, 25 May 2012, Hans de Goede wrote: >> I spend the last 1.5 days debugging a problem with redirecting >> certain USB mass-storage devices to a Windows 7 vm. >> >> This problem only happens when the device is plugged into an >> USB 3 port.

Re: [Libusbx-devel] Fedora 17

2012-06-03 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 06/03/2012 04:15 PM, Chuck Cook wrote: > Okay, when your ready, I have a x64 AMD quad core running FC17 with all > the latest updates. I am wiling to give any libusbx packages a try > before you release them into the wild. To be clear, I don't plan on doing a libusbx update for Fedora-1

Re: [Libusbx-devel] [RFC PATCH] windows_usb: get_device_list: if the backend api changed, use the new api

2012-06-03 Thread Uri Lublin
On 05/22/2012 04:30 AM, Xiaofan Chen wrote: > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: The problem is that with usb device redirection we can have 1 device already redirected, and then the user asks to redirect another device to the virtual machine, so we install a driv

Re: [Libusbx-devel] Fedora 17

2012-06-03 Thread Chuck Cook
Okay, when your ready, I have a x64 AMD quad core running FC17 with all the latest updates. I am wiling to give any libusbx packages a try before you release them into the wild. Chuck On 06/03/2012 09:51 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 06/03/2012 01:12 PM, Chuck Cook wrote: >> libusbx

Re: [Libusbx-devel] Fedora 17

2012-06-03 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 06/03/2012 01:12 PM, Chuck Cook wrote: > libusbx doesn't appear to have made it into the available packages for > Fedora 17. All I find is libusb 1.0.9.rc1 which is very out of date at > this time. I'm the Fedora libusb maintainer, and as Xiaofan already indicated I was too late with gett

Re: [Libusbx-devel] Fedora 17

2012-06-03 Thread Xiaofan Chen
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Chuck Cook wrote: > libusbx doesn't appear to have made it into the available packages for > Fedora 17.  All I find is libusb 1.0.9.rc1 which is very out of date at > this time. I believe it was too late for Fedora 17 Release and it will probably be in Fedora 18 an

[Libusbx-devel] Fedora 17

2012-06-03 Thread Chuck Cook
libusbx doesn't appear to have made it into the available packages for Fedora 17. All I find is libusb 1.0.9.rc1 which is very out of date at this time. Chuck -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event w