Re: [Libusbx-devel] libusb-win32 and libusbK support has now been pushed to mainline

2012-09-07 Thread David Grant
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Pete Batard wrote: > I have of course now been able to confirm this, by commenting out the > disabling of ALLOW_PARTIAL_READS in libusbx, and verifying that it lets > K complete the mass storage test where it previously failed. > I removed the line that disables

Re: [Libusbx-devel] libusb-win32 and libusbK support has now been pushed to mainline

2012-09-07 Thread Xiaofan Chen
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 1:45 AM, Pete Batard wrote: > On 2012.09.07 13:53, Xiaofan Chen wrote: >> If I use Zadig to install the filter driver on top of the existing >> FTDI driver, "xusb -j" does not work. It seems to me in that >> case the extra line you add in the inf file does not really >> do w

Re: [Libusbx-devel] libusb-win32 and libusbK support has now been pushed to mainline

2012-09-07 Thread Pete Batard
On 2012.09.07 13:53, Xiaofan Chen wrote: > If I use Zadig to install the filter driver on top of the existing > FTDI driver, "xusb -j" does not work. It seems to me in that > case the extra line you add in the inf file does not really > do what it supposed to do. Haven't had a chance to try the fi

Re: [Libusbx-devel] [PATCH] Update libusb.h header in accordance with USB 3.0 specs v2

2012-09-07 Thread Pete Batard
On 2012.09.07 11:03, Hans de Goede wrote: > Looks good, as for the anonymous union versus not, given that you > clearly dislike it and I can understand why (its ugly), lets just > go with the rename. OK. If we think this needs to be discussed further, I don't have a problem pushing the MaxPower -

Re: [Libusbx-devel] question on libusb_bulk_transfer and libusb_fill_bulk_transfer

2012-09-07 Thread Tim Roberts
John Chen wrote: > > The device I am working right now demanding sending and receiving data > in unsigned int, and every bit has to be in exact position, in windows > it is easy as the DeviceIoContorl takes a void pointer, but in libusb, > both libusb_bulk_transfer and libusb_fill_bulk_transfer onl

Re: [Libusbx-devel] libusb-win32 and libusbK support has now been pushed to mainline

2012-09-07 Thread Xiaofan Chen
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 6:20 AM, Pete Batard wrote: > On 2012.09.06 15:02, Xiaofan Chen wrote: >> Since you have not released the update Zadig yet. > > Well, I said 24 hours, which, due to various circumstances, I very much > meant. But now Zadig v2.0.1.158 has been released... Okay, I tested usin

Re: [Libusbx-devel] [PATCH] Update libusb.h header in accordance with USB 3.0 specs v2

2012-09-07 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, Looks good, as for the anonymous union versus not, given that you clearly dislike it and I can understand why (its ugly), lets just go with the rename. We must however then document this in NEWS, including documenting the necessary #ifdef for code using it to be able to compile with both older