Re: [Libusbx-devel] libusbx v1.0.14

2012-10-01 Thread Xiaofan Chen
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Pete Batard wrote: > On 2012.09.30 01:04, Chuck Cook wrote: >> One core issue that I see as a need to be addressed. Is a set of tests >> with baseline devices which exercise all functions of every API on every >> platform. No final release until all the test boxe

Re: [Libusbx-devel] list_entry() macro null deref

2012-10-01 Thread Pete Batard
Hi Sean, I fear that this one will fall through if we don't have an issue for it, so I logged https://github.com/libusbx/libusbx/issues/53 Please don't hesitate to use the issue reporting feature from github, for code improvements, as it should help ensure they find their way into a release.

Re: [Libusbx-devel] libusbx v1.0.14

2012-10-01 Thread Pete Batard
On 2012.10.01 16:37, Sean McBride wrote: > But that's not a reason to have *no* unit testing. :) Yeah, and the wiki Test page should be proof enough that I don't want that either. All I'm trying to point out is that it's unrealistic to expect us to go through the whole gamut of what we should i

Re: [Libusbx-devel] Problems installing WinUSB or libusb-win32using Zadig

2012-10-01 Thread Pete Batard
On 2012.10.01 16:29, philip.jos...@microchip.com wrote: > The problem is that WDK8 drops the support for Windows XP. > So KMDF 1.11 will not work under XP. In fact, it only supports > Vista onwards. OK, I guess that means I'll have to release 2 versions of Zadig until XP is sunset (2014.04.08): O

Re: [Libusbx-devel] Problems installing WinUSB or libusb-win32using Zadig

2012-10-01 Thread Philip.Joslin
We ran into the same problem with XP after migrating to W8 level co-installers for WinUSB. We had to roll back our support for XP. This can also occur if an item is built on Vista and you attempt to run it on W8 (there are some items in the support DLL that are no longer there). -Original Mes

Re: [Libusbx-devel] libusbx v1.0.14

2012-10-01 Thread Sean McBride
On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 01:06:05 +0100, Pete Batard said: >The one problem I see is, comprehensive unit testing is fine on paper, >when you have the resources. But I seriously see us having a major >constraint in that domain, and right now, I see rigorous comprehensive >unit testing as utterly unrea

Re: [Libusbx-devel] libusb-win32 driver and libusbx 1.0.14

2012-10-01 Thread Xiaofan Chen
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Pete Batard wrote: > On 2012.10.01 00:57, Xiaofan Chen wrote: >> One minor issue, libusb0.dll is not used for libusbK.dll, libusbk.dll >> directly talked to libusb0.sys, just like it directly talks to libusbk.sys. > > Ok. I was wondering about that as well. Another

Re: [Libusbx-devel] Problems installing WinUSB or libusb-win32 using Zadig

2012-10-01 Thread Xiaofan Chen
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Christo wrote: > I'm running Windows XP sp3 in Virtualbox on Debian to test > cross-platform functionality of libusbx with an embedded device. I have > successfully installed the libusb0 driver using Zadig (2.0.1.159) and my > test code works. libusbx and this devi