On 10.2.2013 5.05, "Pete Batard" wrote:
>
>That's the way I see it as well. I can't help but feel concerned that
>once again we have an API that originated straight from POSIX
>environments, and that hasn't bothered much in trying to at least
>outline what it's gonna mean for Windows. I kind of re
On 10.2.2013 3.03, "Xiaofan Chen" wrote:
>
>I think the hotplug API proposed there is not complete
>and I am sure Pete will have some different ideas
>about the API. libusbx and libusb will probably diverge
>on the Hotplug API.
I'm all for diverging at this point if it makes technical
sense.
>
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> Just came across this one. The author appears to be an active
> user of libusb/libusbx judging from a few tickers he created.
> https://bitbucket.org/liamstask/libusbus/overview
>
> I actually have problems to build it under Mac OS X 10.7.5.
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Pete Batard wrote:
> I think our standing was that we'd start looking into it in 2.x, when we
> have completed the existing tasks we have lined up for 1.x.
> I know the milestone says 3.x, but I never got a chance to reorganize
> the items there the way I see them
Just came across this one. The author appears to be an active
user of libusb/libusbx judging from a few tickers he created.
https://bitbucket.org/liamstask/libusbus/overview
The motivation is kind of interesting. It seems to be a viable
alternative for people looking for a cut-down version of
libu
On 2013.02.10 01:03, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 2:15 AM, Kustaa Nyholm
> wrote:
>> I'm sure many here also watch the libusb-devel list,
>>
>> perhaps excluding Pete.
I'm still following it, from afar.
But from a libusbx perspective, what I'm really interested in is what
actua
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 2:15 AM, Kustaa Nyholm
wrote:
> I'm sure many here also watch the libusb-devel list,
>
> perhaps excluding Pete.
>
> They have made some progress in defining the hotplug
> API...what is our standing on this?
>
> Do we want to have a look at their vision, pick on it,
> or wh
Hi,
I'm sure many here also watch the libusb-devel list,
perhaps excluding Pete.
They have made some progress in defining the hotplug
API...what is our standing on this?
Do we want to have a look at their vision, pick on it,
or what?
Has anyone actually had a peek?
As I'm not actively coding
On 9.2.2013 9.57, "Ramon Zambelli" wrote:
>On 09-Feb-13 8:12 AM, Kustaa Nyholm wrote:
>> On 9.2.2013 9.04, "Ramon Zambelli" wrote:
>>
>>> In previous post I saw people looking for a JAVA JNA wrapper for
>>>libusb.
>>> I put an eclipse project which implements some of the libusb functions
>>> in
