On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 5:58 AM, wrote:
> Thanks for the response. For some reason, usbview refuses to execute
> on this system -- just spins the "hourglass" for a few seconds and then
> nothing happens.
> Nothing identifiable in the task manager's application list, nothing in the
> list of proc
Hi,
I'm running the latest code from the master branch
(cf8a313b2cdb6a25f00730452aab9130cac5c52b) and am in the process of
converting my application to use hotplug functionality on Linux. When my
application calls libusb_get_device_list(), it hangs forever.
I have tracked the issue to the hotplug
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 17:24:17 +, Nathan Hjelm said:
>I own the mailing list now and I see no reason not to re-add [libusb-
>devel] to the subject.
That's such a long prefix, and really annoying on mobile devices with limited
space. Is there more than 1 libusb list? How about just "[libusb]
2013/6/12 Nathan Hjelm :
> Done.
>
Thanks :)
--
Best Regards,
Wander Lairson Costa
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
___
Done.On Jun 12, 2013, at 11:24 AM, Nathan Hjelm wrote:I own the mailing list now and I see no reason not to re-add [libusb-devel] to the subject.-NathanOn Jun 12, 2013, at 10:54 AM, Tim Roberts wrote:Pete Batard wrote: > > Can you explain a bit more about this? Did the libusb-devel prefix > chan
I own the mailing list now and I see no reason not to re-add [libusb-devel] to the subject.-NathanOn Jun 12, 2013, at 10:54 AM, Tim Roberts wrote:Pete Batard wrote: > > Can you explain a bit more about this? Did the libusb-devel prefix > change or something? If so, do you have any idea what the r
Pete Batard wrote:
>
> Can you explain a bit more about this? Did the libusb-devel prefix
> change or something? If so, do you have any idea what the reason was?
Surely this is not a surprise to you. The change was made last year.
Quoting from Peter Stuge's email of 18 April 2012:
> NOTE: I wi
2013/6/11 Pete Batard :
> On 2013.06.11 15:01, Wander Lairson Costa wrote:
>> Are all libusbx maintainers back to libusb-devel mailing list?
>
> Besides myself, I don't think any of the other maintainers ever
> officially left libusb-devel. And I have been monitoring what happened
> over at libusb-
Hi,
On 06/12/2013 01:45 AM, Pete Batard wrote:
> On 2013.06.11 11:10, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> I think it would be good to tag current master as 1.0.16-rc1, spin
>> tarbals, etc.
>
> I'd prefer if we don't tag the RC-1 until next Monday, on account that:
> - I'd like to keep at least a little dista
