On Sep 12, 2013, at 6:35 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09/11/2013 11:04 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 09/11/2013 04:10 PM, Nathan Hjelm wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sep 11, 2013, at 7:15 AM, Nathan Hjelm wrote:
>>>
One question. Would it make sense to add an additional transfer
FYI I have rebased my changes on top of the master branch, which got me the
usbi_get_device_by_session_id changes, after a few changes here and there my
branch is again ready to be tested.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/libusbx/libusbx/issues/9#issuecom
Please use https://github.com/manuelnaranjo/libusbx/tree/windows-hotplug-2
instead, I changed the way devices are enumerated, and got an implementation
that seems to work fine.
There are a few things that still need to be tested, like I don't have any
USB3.0 device so I can't tell if it works,
Hi,
On 09/11/2013 11:04 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09/11/2013 04:10 PM, Nathan Hjelm wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 11, 2013, at 7:15 AM, Nathan Hjelm wrote:
>>
>>> One question. Would it make sense to add an additional transfer type for
>>> stream transfers? The stream_id field is not set to 0
