Re: [Libusbx-devel] [Released] PyUSB 1.0.0 beta 1

2013-10-30 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 09:24:11PM -0200, Wander Lairson Costa wrote: > 2013/10/30 Johannes Stezenbach : > > >> >> >> > [2249737.372143] usb 1-1.1: usbfs: process 32478 (python) did not > >> >> >> > claim interface 0 before use > >&g

Re: [Libusbx-devel] [Released] PyUSB 1.0.0 beta 1

2013-10-30 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 06:06:43PM -0200, Wander Lairson Costa wrote: > 2013/10/29 Johannes Stezenbach : > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 02:58:45PM -0200, Wander Lairson Costa wrote: > > > > I was testing with a Linux based device and gadget g_zero, and > > the EPIPE error

Re: [Libusbx-devel] [pyusb-users] [Released] PyUSB 1.0.0 beta 1

2013-10-30 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 08:13:45PM -0200, Wander Lairson Costa wrote: > 2013/10/29 Tormod Volden : > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Wander Lairson Costa wrote: > >> 2013/10/29 Johannes Stezenbach: > >>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 02:58:45PM -0200, Wander Lairson

Re: [Libusbx-devel] [Released] PyUSB 1.0.0 beta 1

2013-10-29 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 02:58:45PM -0200, Wander Lairson Costa wrote: > 2013/10/29 Johannes Stezenbach : > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:16:51PM -0200, Wander Lairson Costa wrote: > >> 2013/10/29 Johannes Stezenbach : > >> > > >> > One remark: The &qu

Re: [Libusbx-devel] [Released] PyUSB 1.0.0 beta 1

2013-10-29 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:16:51PM -0200, Wander Lairson Costa wrote: > 2013/10/29 Johannes Stezenbach : > > > > One remark: The "Let's get it started" example in > > docs/tutorial.rst looks confusing, why does it do this: > > > > cfg = dev.get

Re: [Libusbx-devel] [Released] PyUSB 1.0.0 beta 1

2013-10-29 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
Hi, On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 08:51:24AM -0300, Wander Lairson Costa wrote: > I am proud to announce that PyUSB 1.0.0 beta is out. ... > TODO > > > * More tests with legacy module. > * Isochronous transfers for libusb-win32. > > Download page > - > > https://sourceforge.net/proje

Re: [Libusbx-devel] [PATCH] RFC: Add a libusb_strerror() function

2013-05-31 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 04:25:10PM +, Nathan Hjelm wrote: > The contents of gettext-runtime/COPYING: > > The gettext-runtime package is partially under the LGPL and partially under > the GPL. > > The following parts are under the LGPL, see file intl/COPYING.LIB: >   - the libintl and libaspri

Re: [Libusbx-devel] [PATCH] RFC: Add a libusb_strerror() function

2013-05-30 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:50:39PM +0100, Pete Batard wrote: > On 2013.05.29 23:25, Hans de Goede wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 05/30/2013 12:17 AM, Sean McBride wrote: > >> On Thu, 30 May 2013 00:17:11 +0200, Hans de Goede said: > >> > IMHO you should use LC_MESSAGES in the usual way instead > >>

Re: [Libusbx-devel] [PATCH] RFC: Add a libusb_strerror() function

2013-05-29 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:25:42PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > This patch adds the much requested libusb_strerror() function, taking into > account all issues people raised wrt previous attempts. > > Criteria / Decisions underlying this implementation: > -Must support translated messages > -Must

Re: [Libusbx-devel] ABI stability discussion (was [PATCH] Add support for BOS and Endpoint Companion USB 3.0 descriptors)

2013-05-18 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
Hi, On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 12:05:26PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > I've been in the Linux distro "business" for a long time now, and > there is a HUGE cost to ABI breaking library releases. And almost > always the old and new version will need to be maintained in parallel > for a long time. F

Re: [Libusbx-devel] hot unplug on windows, only 3 IN transfers complete

2012-06-18 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 02:39:45PM +0100, Pete Batard wrote: > On 2012.06.18 11:50, Peter Stuge wrote: > >Liam Staskawicz wrote: > >> This works as intended on OS X, but on Windows I only ever see 3 > >> transfers complete > > > > If the later 13 were successfully submitted then that is a bug in th

Re: [Libusbx-devel] libusbx v1.0.12 has been released

2012-06-16 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 05:39:58PM -0600, Nathan Hjelm wrote: > There are two seperate issues here: > 1) whether or not vendors should be abusing the HID interface to > bypass problems with the Windows driver model, and > 2) whether or not these devices should be accessed with libusb. > > Let m

Re: [Libusbx-devel] libusbx git repo updated

2012-04-26 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
Hi, On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:12:22AM +0100, Pete Batard wrote: > We *will* deviate in an incompatible fashion sooner rather than later. > To me, trying to delay this inevitability doesn't seem very productive. ... > On 2012.04.23 08:40, Hans de Goede wrote: > > IMHO in this case maintaining ABI