Re: [Libusbx-devel] [libusbx] Adding support for compiling at *-linux-android platform (#154)

2013-10-22 Thread tobygray
It would be good to update the android/config.h file for the NDK based builds of libusbx for Android so that it doesn't need to have a duplicate definition of TIMESPEC_TO_TIMEVAL at the end. I might have misunderstood the intention, but this change doesn't appear to cope with all the possible A

Re: [Libusbx-devel] [libusbx] Windows: hotplug/unplug support (#9)

2013-10-11 Thread tobygray
@manuelnaranjo shouldn't the #define checks then be changed to OS_WINDOWS and OS_WINCE? Also wouldn't mingw provide a unistd.h which provides the required defines? How are you compiling with mingw and what compiler error does it produce without including config.h? --- Reply to this email direc

Re: [Libusbx-devel] [libusbx] Windows: hotplug/unplug support (#9)

2013-10-11 Thread tobygray
Hi Manuel, Regarding the addition of config.h into the testlib.c in b86964a , what values were you needing to pass? Was it just _WIN32? Regards, Toby On 10/10/13 02:02, Manuel Francisco Naranjo wrote: > > Pete, > > Don't worry on sounding har

Re: [Libusbx-devel] [libusbx] Enable building on all Android architectures, including MIPS (working around an MIPS NDK linker bug). (#134)

2013-08-21 Thread tobygray
The Android build changes look good now, thanks for making those changes. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/libusbx/libusbx/pull/134#issuecomment-23015293 -- Introducing Performance

Re: [Libusbx-devel] [libusbx] Enable building on all Android architectures, including MIPS. (#133)

2013-08-20 Thread tobygray
I agree with the architecture change, "all" is a far better choice. The -llog changes are slightly less straightforward though. The sample and test applications for Android don't directly call any Android logging code, so shouldn't need to have liblog.so added to their NEEDED sections. Comparin