On 2012.05.24 14:12, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> I am not so sure if gerrit is good for libusbx or not. From the OpenOCD
> side it seems to be a success mostly. But it does prevent some users
> from posting patches as well. OpenOCD is considered to be a big
> project whereas libusb/libusbx are much small
On 2012.05.24 14:17, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> One git question first, how to revert the v2 patch and then apply
> this patch?
If you just applied a patch, "git reset HEAD" should do the job... I
think (I'd have to look up the command, since with TGit I'm just doing
that in a couple of clicks by acc
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
>> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Pete Batard wrote:
>>> Finally got around looking further at the Darwin issue. It looks like the
>>> main problem was that process_new_device() was main
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Pete Batard wrote:
>> Finally got around looking further at the Darwin issue. It looks like the
>> main problem was that process_new_device() was maintaining a static device
>> pointer for the last device seen
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Pete Batard wrote:
> Finally got around looking further at the Darwin issue. It looks like the
> main problem was that process_new_device() was maintaining a static device
> pointer for the last device seen (last_dev), and the value wasn't reset as
> it should when
Finally got around looking further at the Darwin issue. It looks like
the main problem was that process_new_device() was maintaining a static
device pointer for the last device seen (last_dev), and the value wasn't
reset as it should when calling get_device_list(), resulting in a bad
pointer re
