On 2012.09.17 09:51, Hans de Goede wrote:
> may I suggest one modification though:
> 1) We make the extra parameter: "const char *lang" (I guess you already
> had that in mind just stating it explicitly)
Anything ISO, be it string or int, is fine by me. I have no preference
either way, and from w
Hi,
On 09/15/2012 04:31 PM, Pete Batard wrote:
> On 2012.09.15 11:35, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> BTW I agree that we really need to do a libusb_strerror()
>> but I also agree that that should handle translations...
>>
>> For Linux this can be easily done with gettext, but for
>> other platforms it ca
On 2012.09.15 11:35, Hans de Goede wrote:
> BTW I agree that we really need to do a libusb_strerror()
> but I also agree that that should handle translations...
>
> For Linux this can be easily done with gettext, but for
> other platforms it cannot... Either way we should honor
> the LANG / LC_MESS
Hi,
On 09/14/2012 01:49 AM, Pete Batard wrote:
> Besides the USB 3.0/bMaxPower patch, which I'll try to push tomorrow, 2
> other items I would still consider open for 1.0.13 would be:
> - The pkg-config --static and libusb-1.0.pc issue (for which I created
> issue #43: https://github.com/libusb
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Pete Batard wrote:
> On 2012.09.15 02:36, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
>> I have created the ticket.
>
> Thanks.
>
>> I have also updated the user permission settings for libusbK
>> and libusb-win32. Now logged-in user should be able to create
>> and update tickets.
>
> Sti
On 2012.09.15 02:36, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> I have created the ticket.
Thanks.
> I have also updated the user permission settings for libusbK
> and libusb-win32. Now logged-in user should be able to create
> and update tickets.
Still can't seem to have the ability to create a new ticket I'm afrai
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 7:16 AM, David Grant wrote:
>> > It should work. Please try again.
>> > http://sourceforge.net/p/libusbk/tickets/
>> > Once you log in, click "Create Ticket" in the left panel and
>> > you can then log the ticket.
>>
>> Tried that of course. If there's a "create" button, ei
On 2012.09.14 13:23, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Ludovic Rousseau
>> As noted in the bug tracker, You have to use both --libs and --static
>
> Thanks for the tips. now it works. I agree that we can close this
> issue now.
You know you don't have to wait for me to close a
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Pete Batard wrote:
> On 2012.09.14 02:14, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> >
> > It should work. Please try again.
> > http://sourceforge.net/p/libusbk/tickets/
> >
> > You need to log in to create a new ticket. This is to prevent spam.
> >
> > Once you log in, click "Creat
On 2012.09.14 02:14, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
>> Since I'd like Travis to have a look into it at some stage, as I'm
>> pretty sure it's a K bug, I've been trying to figure out where to log a
>> tracker issue for libusbK, but didn't manage to find out where to do
>> that in SF's new tracker. Would it be
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Ludovic Rousseau
wrote:
> 2012/9/14 Pete Batard :
>> Besides the USB 3.0/bMaxPower patch, which I'll try to push tomorrow, 2
>> other items I would still consider open for 1.0.13 would be:
>> - The pkg-config --static and libusb-1.0.pc issue (for which I created
>>
2012/9/14 Pete Batard :
> Besides the USB 3.0/bMaxPower patch, which I'll try to push tomorrow, 2
> other items I would still consider open for 1.0.13 would be:
> - The pkg-config --static and libusb-1.0.pc issue (for which I created
> issue #43: https://github.com/libusbx/libusbx/issues/43)
As no
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Pete Batard wrote:
> Just pushed the fxload sample fix as well as the libusbK bulk transfer
> workaround (switch ALLOW_PARTIAL_READS pipe policy to enabled by
> default). I also pushed Ludovic's xusb fixes for #42, with some
> modification.
> See the comment from h
Just pushed the fxload sample fix as well as the libusbK bulk transfer
workaround (switch ALLOW_PARTIAL_READS pipe policy to enabled by
default). I also pushed Ludovic's xusb fixes for #42, with some
modification.
See the comment from https://github.com/libusbx/libusbx/pull/42.
Since I'd like T
On 2012.09.06 11:04, Hans de Goede wrote:
> In the mean time if you're convinced that the libusb using application
> part (so the external) API is solid, I'm fine with doing this for just
> windows for now
I'm never convinced that anything I code is solid. Ever.
That's why I subscribe to RERO. :)
On 06/09/12 01:03, Pete Batard wrote:
> Since we need to gear up for the 1.0.13 release, I have just pushed
> back a few of the tasks that we had planned but that I don't really
> see happening over the next few days, into 1.0.14. These include:
>
> - Adding the WinCE backend (Note to Toby: Yes,
Hi,
On 09/06/2012 02:03 AM, Pete Batard wrote:
> Since we need to gear up for the 1.0.13 release
+1 For moving towards a 1.0.13 release.
> I have just pushed back
> a few of the tasks that we had planned but that I don't really see
> happening over the next few days, into 1.0.14. These include:
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Pete Batard wrote:
> Since we need to gear up for the 1.0.13 release, I have just pushed back
> a few of the tasks that we had planned but that I don't really see
> happening over the next few days, into 1.0.14. These include:
>
> - Adding the WinCE backend (Note to
18 matches
Mail list logo
