On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 17:24:17 +, Nathan Hjelm said:
>I own the mailing list now and I see no reason not to re-add [libusb-
>devel] to the subject.
That's such a long prefix, and really annoying on mobile devices with limited
space. Is there more than 1 libusb list? How about just "[libusb]
2013/6/12 Nathan Hjelm :
> Done.
>
Thanks :)
--
Best Regards,
Wander Lairson Costa
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
___
Done.On Jun 12, 2013, at 11:24 AM, Nathan Hjelm wrote:I own the mailing list now and I see no reason not to re-add [libusb-devel] to the subject.-NathanOn Jun 12, 2013, at 10:54 AM, Tim Roberts wrote:Pete Batard wrote: > > Can you explain a bit more about this? Did the libusb-devel prefix > chan
I own the mailing list now and I see no reason not to re-add [libusb-devel] to the subject.-NathanOn Jun 12, 2013, at 10:54 AM, Tim Roberts wrote:Pete Batard wrote: > > Can you explain a bit more about this? Did the libusb-devel prefix > change or something? If so, do you have any idea what the r
Pete Batard wrote:
>
> Can you explain a bit more about this? Did the libusb-devel prefix
> change or something? If so, do you have any idea what the reason was?
Surely this is not a surprise to you. The change was made last year.
Quoting from Peter Stuge's email of 18 April 2012:
> NOTE: I wi
2013/6/11 Pete Batard :
> On 2013.06.11 15:01, Wander Lairson Costa wrote:
>> Are all libusbx maintainers back to libusb-devel mailing list?
>
> Besides myself, I don't think any of the other maintainers ever
> officially left libusb-devel. And I have been monitoring what happened
> over at libusb-
On 2013.06.11 15:01, Wander Lairson Costa wrote:
> Are all libusbx maintainers back to libusb-devel mailing list?
Besides myself, I don't think any of the other maintainers ever
officially left libusb-devel. And I have been monitoring what happened
over at libusb-devel anyway.
Yet, I would stil
2013/6/11 Pete Batard :
Hi Pete,
> On 2013.06.10 23:28, Pete Batard wrote:
>> we will most likely drop the libusb-devel one...
>
> Oops, meant libusbx-devel here.
>
Are all libusbx maintainers back to libusb-devel mailing list? I ask
because both projects have so much in common that when I have
On 2013.06.10 23:28, Pete Batard wrote:
> we will most likely drop the libusb-devel one...
Oops, meant libusbx-devel here.
/Pete
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/s
Hi Wander,
On 2013.06.10 19:56, Wander Lairson Costa wrote:
> Would be possible to rejoin the mailing lists earlier? Sometimes I
> don't know which mailing list I am supposed to send messages to
> (libusb, libusbx or both?).
Up until now, libusb and libusbx were completely separate projects, so
2013/6/10 Pete Batard :
> On 2013.06.10 17:42, Nathan Hjelm wrote:
>> Peter's time has gotten to be very limited so I have opted to take over
>> maintenance of
>> libusb. I have been in contact with the libusbx team to and invited them
>> to rejoin libusb
>> as maintainers and they have accepted. T
On 2013.06.10 17:42, Nathan Hjelm wrote:
> Peter's time has gotten to be very limited so I have opted to take over
> maintenance of
> libusb. I have been in contact with the libusbx team to and invited them
> to rejoin libusb
> as maintainers and they have accepted. The plan is for us to work
> tog
12 matches
Mail list logo
