On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Kustaa Nyholm
wrote:
> On 10.2.2013 3.03, "Xiaofan Chen" wrote:
>>
>>As for the implementation, you can see that Peter is not
>>satisfied with the Linux implementation. He has a good
>>point about udev not always available, especially among
>>Android and other emb
On 10.2.2013 16.06, "Xiaofan Chen" wrote:
>>
>> Now, I find that disturbing this seems to imply something
>> that I as an application developer would not like.
>
>Why? That is kind of the norm for Linux. The user's
>system will either have a udev available or the
>other alternative mdev available.
Hi libusbx developers,
could somebody take a look at:
https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/103 &
https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/218 ?
DAFlippers comments:
"I have reported LIBUSB-1.0 interrupt _transfer issue already:
The calls do not return data although data is read(/writte
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Dominik Röttsches wrote:
> Hi libusbx developers,
>
> could somebody take a look at:
> https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/103 &
> https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/218 ?
>
> DAFlippers comments:
> "I have reported LIBUSB-1.0 interrupt _transfer
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 11:53 PM, Kustaa Nyholm
wrote:
> Open Source and Free software will need to provide the
> convenience of "AppStores" if they want to keep their
> foot hold not to mention expand it.
Ubuntu is working toward that. On the other hand, I
do not like Ubuntu Software center at a
On 11.2.2013 4.38, "Xiaofan Chen" wrote:
>
>Ubuntu is working toward that. On the other hand, I
>do not like Ubuntu Software center at all. I prefer
>Synaptic better and sometims use the command
>line apt.
I had high hopes for Ubuntu, but then Unity changed
it all and I had to give up on it, desp
