Being able to allocate bulk-streams is not really useful if the user cannot
specify the stream ids when submitting transfers.
Note that the actual stream id gets added to our private itransfer struct,
and a setter + getter is added to get to it. Unfortunately this is the only
way to add support fo
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede
---
libusb/core.c | 62 +
libusb/libusb.h | 5
libusb/libusbi.h| 8 +++
libusb/os/linux_usbfs.c | 47 +
libusb/os/linux_usbfs.h | 8 +++
libus
Hi All,
These 2 patches add support to the libusb API and Linux backend for USB-3
bulk streams. The Linux backend code uses a new usbfs API for this which
I've proposed upstream, and which has received favorable review upstream.
Like the Linux kernel patches, these patches are only RFC for now, s
Looks good to me. I will spend some time over the next couple of days
implementing stream support on Darwin. I don’t have any devices to test the
code with though.
-Nathan
On Sep 11, 2013, at 5:53 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> These 2 patches add support to the libusb API and Linux
One question. Would it make sense to add an additional transfer type for stream
transfers? The stream_id field is not set to 0 by libusb_fill_bulk_transfer so
I can not reliably tell if a transfer is a stream transfer in the backend. I
need a reliable way to detect stream transfers so I can swit
Hi,
On 09/11/2013 02:47 PM, Nathan Hjelm wrote:
> Looks good to me. I will spend some time over the next couple of days
> implementing stream support on Darwin. I don’t have any devices to test the
> code with though.
Oh, very good, one of my main worries was how portable the API would
be, so h
One more thing. I think we should make the stream id either a uint32_t or
unsigned int. It can never be negative and stream id 0 is not a valid stream.
-Nathan
--
How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments:
1
On Sep 11, 2013, at 7:15 AM, Nathan Hjelm wrote:
> One question. Would it make sense to add an additional transfer type for
> stream transfers? The stream_id field is not set to 0 by
> libusb_fill_bulk_transfer so I can not reliably tell if a transfer is a
> stream transfer in the backend. I
Hi,
On 09/11/2013 04:10 PM, Nathan Hjelm wrote:
>
> On Sep 11, 2013, at 7:15 AM, Nathan Hjelm wrote:
>
>> One question. Would it make sense to add an additional transfer type for
>> stream transfers? The stream_id field is not set to 0 by
>> libusb_fill_bulk_transfer so I can not reliably tell
