On Jan 16, 2008 1:04 PM, Mikhail A. Pokidko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Hi, Shuveb,
there is a whole bunch of questions!
Quota is not implemented as yet.
As quota is not implemented yet i want to ask - what is the meaning of it?
Is it analog of diskspace and diskinodes?
Yes Mikhail,
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
How about this patch. I define VIR_DEBUG in src/internal.c. Each module
which wants to output debug messages adds
#define DEBUG(fmt,...) VIR_DEBUG(driver, fmt, __VA_ARGS__)
#define DEBUG0(msg) VIR_DEBUG(driver, %s, msg)
Changing 'driver' to whatever their module
DL Would init or boot make sense in this case as well? I'm open to
DL changing it as long as it makes sense to everyone.
I think that init is a widely-recognized term for the master process
in a given process namespace. I would also think that, at least from
a libvirt perspective, most people
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 07:05:19AM -0800, Dan Smith wrote:
DL Would init or boot make sense in this case as well? I'm open to
DL changing it as long as it makes sense to everyone.
I think that init is a widely-recognized term for the master process
in a given process namespace. I would
I compiled libvirt with the latest gcc in rawhide and these CFLAGS:
-O
-Wall
-Wcast-align
-Wextra
-Wformat
-Wformat-security
-Winit-self
-Winline
-Wmissing-prototypes
-Wnested-externs
-Wno-sign-compare
-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
-Wpointer-arith
-Wredundant-decls
Jim Meyering wrote:
virsh.c:6896: warning: format not a string literal and no format arguments
Yes, I was getting these too when I was using gcc 4 under Windows.
+1 to this patch - it looks fine.
Rich.
--
Emerging Technologies, Red Hat - http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/
Registered Address:
Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
virsh.c:6896: warning: format not a string literal and no format arguments
Yes, I was getting these too when I was using gcc 4 under Windows.
+1 to this patch - it looks fine.
Thanks. I've committed it.
--
Libvir-list
DL network
DL ipaddress192.168.1.110/ipaddress
DL hostnamebrowndog/hostname
DL gateway192.168.1.1/gateway
DL nameserver192.168.1.1/nameserver
DL netmask255.255.255.0/netmask
DL /network
This is me showing my complete ignorance here,
On Jan 17, 2008 2:30 AM, Dan Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DL network
DL ipaddress192.168.1.110/ipaddress
DL hostnamebrowndog/hostname
DL gateway192.168.1.1/gateway
DL nameserver192.168.1.1/nameserver
DL netmask255.255.255.0/netmask
Hello,
I created a guest from XML without a bootloader tag. When I run
dumpxml on the guest, I notice that an empty bootloader / tag is
appended. Is this the expected behavior? This seems to differ from the
behavior of other optional tags.
Thanks!
Log:
$ cat
Currently NIC definition order is reversed.
If we set over 4-NICs for a domain by virt-install,
this causes a network communication problem.
This is because virtual mac to eth relation is lost.
This patch fixes the NIC definition order.
N.B.
If less than 3-NICs, this problem does not occur.
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Shuveb Hussain wrote:
On Jan 17, 2008 2:30 AM, Dan Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DL network
DL ipaddress192.168.1.110/ipaddress
DL hostnamebrowndog/hostname
DL gateway192.168.1.1/gateway
DL nameserver192.168.1.1/nameserver
DL
12 matches
Mail list logo