Good evening,
could anybody explain me this, please?
divinus:~ # virsh
error: cannot recv data: : Connection reset by peer
error: failed to connect to the hypervisor
divinus:~ #
I am trying to imlement Chris's ruby-libvirt to my Ruby on Rails
application. First few connection to libvirt daemon (
> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 16:21:47 +0100
> From:
berra...@redhat.com
> To: johnlu...@hotmail.com
> CC:
libvir-list@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [libvirt] (how much) support
for kqemu domain
>
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:11:48AM
-0400, John Lumby wrote:
> >
> > I am wondering about
the extent
2010/7/8 Chris Lalancette :
> Otherwise you can get bogus "unknown error" printouts on
> subsequent commands.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Lalancette
> ---
> tools/virsh.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/virsh.c b/tools/virsh.c
> index 6a22071..6b7
2010/7/8 Chris Lalancette :
> The virsh option error reporting was not being used
> consistently; some commands would spit out errors on
> missing required options while others would just silently fail.
> However, vshCommandOptString knows which ones are required
> and which ones aren't, so make it
2010/7/8 Chris Lalancette :
> This helper calls virFileReadAll(), and then outputs a
> proper error if it fails for whatever reason.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Lalancette
> ---
> tools/virsh.c | 65
> 1 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 28 d
2010/7/8 Chris Lalancette :
> With the current virsh code, error reporting is a bit fragile
> because the reporting is decoupled from the place where the
> error occurred. There are two places where this can be a problem:
>
> 1) In utility functions that don't properly dispatch errors
> like the
2010/7/8 Chris Lalancette :
> With the change to make vshError() responsible for printing
> all errors, there were some places in the code that would no
> longer properly print errors. The good news is that the vast
> majority of virsh was already printing errors, so this patch
> just cleans up th
On Saturday, July 17, 2010, Jaromír Červenka wrote:
> Hi ozaki-r,
>
> thank you for answer.
>
> So, there is no posibility that guest can request for more memory (max up to
> maxMemory) and libvirt/hypervisor/whatever will automatically increase it? I
> have to do it manually?
AFAIK yes, it has
Hi ozaki-r,
thank you for answer.
So, there is no posibility that guest can request for more memory (max up to
maxMemory) and libvirt/hypervisor/whatever will automatically increase it? I
have to do it manually?
Jaromir.
Dne 17. července 2010 13:49 Ryota Ozaki napsal(a):
> Hi Jaromír
> 2010/
Hi Jaromír
2010/7/17 Jaromír Červenka :
> Hello,
> Could anybody explain me a little bit what is the difference between
> and . I use qemu-kvm hypervisor. When I have
> 1024MB maxMemory and 512MB of currentMemory, I can see just 512MB in guest
> os (free -m). Is it ok? Does it have something to do
10 matches
Mail list logo