+1 to support adding offline migration API in libvirt, for my
knowledge there were multiple higher management stack in product
did a couple of operations with delete/define to archieve this
goal, but with those fragment operation, higher management need
pay more attention and low level knowledge
在 2012-11-19一的 10:05 +0800，li guang写道：
> 在 2012-11-16五的 13:59 +0100，Jiri Denemark写道：
> > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 09:57:29 +0800, liguang wrote:
> > > original migration did not aware of offline case,
> > > so, try to support offline migration quietly
> > > (did not disturb original migration) by pa
Hi, Shawn,
On 2012年11月16日 21:24, Shawn Furrow wrote:
Osier,
Thanks for including me in the review of this patch. I can tell right
away that your implementation is better. It's more modular and well
documented. When I submitted my patch about a month ago, it was
basically just me submitting the
On 2012年11月17日 06:47, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 16/11/2012 10:59, Osier Yang ha scritto:
If "path" for "ivshmem" memory device is specified, it's going
to be setup with interrupts enabled. Otherwise interrupts is
disabled. To be more clear, let's see the QEMU command line
of both cases:
* With
在 2012-11-16五的 13:59 +0100，Jiri Denemark写道：
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 09:57:29 +0800, liguang wrote:
> > original migration did not aware of offline case,
> > so, try to support offline migration quietly
> > (did not disturb original migration) by pass
> > VIR_MIGRATE_OFFLINE flag to migration APIs
在 2012-11-16五的 11:21 +0100，Jiri Denemark写道：
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 09:26:30 +0800, li guang wrote:
> > 在 2012-11-09五的 13:00 +0100，Jiri Denemark写道：
> > > On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 10:57:23 +0800, li guang wrote:
> > >
> > > Well, and that's the thing that actually needs fixing. The migration code
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 11/16/2012 03:51 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 12:39:45 -0500, Laine Stump wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 03:24:07PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>
>> NACK to this patch. I think the current command na
