On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 09:54:53PM +0100, Paweł Krześniak wrote:
2011/1/4 Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com:
NB, there was a discussion with the dnsmsaq maintainer a few
months back now about changing the dnsmasq architecture such
that we only need one dnsmasq process.
is this
2011/1/4 Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com:
NB, there was a discussion with the dnsmsaq maintainer a few
months back now about changing the dnsmasq architecture such
that we only need one dnsmasq process.
is this consistent with Laine's arguments about radvd?
read last paragraph of this:
2011/1/4 Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:09:54AM +0100, Paweł Krześniak wrote:
I want to create isolated environment for guests - they will be
connected to one bridge and will use private DNS data. No single
packet from this isolated network can reach
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 09:47:10PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
On 12/21/2010 03:40 PM, Paweł Krześniak wrote:
By default dnsmasq is spawned with option --conf-file= which disables
reading of global configuration file -- this is fine for most situations.
In fact, the libvirt policy is that it
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 09:53:57AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
On 12/23/2010 06:50 AM, Paweł Krześniak wrote:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 16:50, Laine Stump la...@laine.org wrote:
I agree with Eric that this should be discussed with Dan Berrange and/or
Daniel Veillard before comitting anything to
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:09:54AM +0100, Paweł Krześniak wrote:
2010/12/22 Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com:
On 12/21/2010 03:40 PM, Paweł Krześniak wrote:
This patch adds possibility to run customized DNS/DHCP environment, by
spawning dnsmasq with alternative configuration file if such file
2010/12/23 Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com:
Rather than tying the element name to our current choice of program, can
we come up with something more generic?
network
namexxxnet/name
ipv4routing/usr/local/bin/my-dnsmasq/ipv4routing
ipv6routing/usr/local/bin/my-radvd/ipv6routing
/network
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 16:50, Laine Stump la...@laine.org wrote:
I agree with Eric that this should be discussed with Dan Berrange and/or
Daniel Veillard before comitting anything to the tree (definitely it needs
doing in some manner, though).
Another idea came to my mind:
Following logic
On 12/23/2010 06:50 AM, Paweł Krześniak wrote:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 16:50, Laine Stump la...@laine.org wrote:
I agree with Eric that this should be discussed with Dan Berrange and/or
Daniel Veillard before comitting anything to the tree (definitely it needs
doing in some manner, though).
2010/12/22 Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com:
On 12/21/2010 03:40 PM, Paweł Krześniak wrote:
This patch adds possibility to run customized DNS/DHCP environment, by
spawning dnsmasq with alternative configuration file if such file exists.
This allows you to set any parameter described in dnsmasq(8).
On 12/22/2010 04:09 AM, Paweł Krześniak wrote:
2010/12/22 Eric Blakeebl...@redhat.com:
On 12/21/2010 03:40 PM, Paweł Krześniak wrote:
This patch adds possibility to run customized DNS/DHCP environment, by
spawning dnsmasq with alternative configuration file if such file exists.
This allows you
By default dnsmasq is spawned with option --conf-file= which disables
reading of global configuration file -- this is fine for most situations.
This patch adds possibility to run customized DNS/DHCP environment, by
spawning dnsmasq with alternative configuration file if such file exists.
This
On 12/21/2010 03:40 PM, Paweł Krześniak wrote:
By default dnsmasq is spawned with option --conf-file= which disables
reading of global configuration file -- this is fine for most situations.
In fact, the libvirt policy is that it is essential to NOT allow the use
of global configuration files -
13 matches
Mail list logo
