Addresses BZ # 622534:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622534
---
tools/virsh.pod | 17 ++---
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/virsh.pod b/tools/virsh.pod
index 4e8b295..0d37512 100644
--- a/tools/virsh.pod
+++ b/tools/virsh.pod
@@
2011/1/27 Justin Clift jcl...@redhat.com:
Addresses BZ # 622534:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622534
---
tools/virsh.pod | 17 ++---
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/virsh.pod b/tools/virsh.pod
index 4e8b295..0d37512
On 28/01/2011, at 3:10 AM, Matthias Bolte wrote:
snip
I didn't post the patch yet, as it isn't finished yet.
When my patch gets accepted your patch needs some small tweaks :)
Heh, no worries. Can I can this as an ACK (for libvirt 0.8.7 thus far) though?
:)
Happy to tweak it again
On 01/27/2011 09:10 AM, Matthias Bolte wrote:
2011/1/27 Justin Clift jcl...@redhat.com:
+Some hypervisors require a larger granularity than kilobytes, rounding down
+or rejecting requests that are not an even multiple of the desired amount.
+vSphere/ESX is one of these, requiring the parameter
On 28/01/2011, at 3:19 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
Do we need three examples, or would two be sufficient?
For example, vSphere/ESX has a 4MB granularity, so 263168 (257MB) would
be rejected while 266240 (260MB) is valid.
Yeah, that'd work too. I'll just that example then push it.
--
libvir-list
On 01/27/2011 09:20 AM, Justin Clift wrote:
On 28/01/2011, at 3:19 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
Do we need three examples, or would two be sufficient?
For example, vSphere/ESX has a 4MB granularity, so 263168 (257MB) would
be rejected while 266240 (260MB) is valid.
Yeah, that'd work too. I'll
On 28/01/2011, at 3:29 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 01/27/2011 09:20 AM, Justin Clift wrote:
On 28/01/2011, at 3:19 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
Do we need three examples, or would two be sufficient?
For example, vSphere/ESX has a 4MB granularity, so 263168 (257MB) would
be rejected while 266240
