On 09/25/2018 02:03 PM, Ján Tomko wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 03:30:02PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> On 09/24/2018 03:14 PM, Ján Tomko wrote:
>>> Please no.
>>>
>>> Despite my comments on the first spacing rule [0], this series slows
>>> down the spacing check by 100 % (from 1.6s to
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 03:30:02PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 09/24/2018 03:14 PM, Ján Tomko wrote:
Please no.
Despite my comments on the first spacing rule [0], this series slows
down the spacing check by 100 % (from 1.6s to 3.1s in my case).
I don't think that syntax-check run time
On 09/24/2018 03:14 PM, Ján Tomko wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:15:22AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> On 09/19/2018 10:38 AM, Shi Lei wrote:
>>> This series check misaligned stuff in parenthesis:
>>> 1. For misaligned arguments of function
>>> 2. For misaligned conditions of
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:15:22AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 09/19/2018 10:38 AM, Shi Lei wrote:
This series check misaligned stuff in parenthesis:
1. For misaligned arguments of function
2. For misaligned conditions of [if|while|switch|...]
It adds a temporary filter for this new rule
On 09/19/2018 10:38 AM, Shi Lei wrote:
> This series check misaligned stuff in parenthesis:
> 1. For misaligned arguments of function
> 2. For misaligned conditions of [if|while|switch|...]
>
> It adds a temporary filter for this new rule since there're
> too much misalignment.
> Now it just fix
This series check misaligned stuff in parenthesis:
1. For misaligned arguments of function
2. For misaligned conditions of [if|while|switch|...]
It adds a temporary filter for this new rule since there're
too much misalignment.
Now it just fix misalignment in src/util and it's the batch I.
Next
