On 03/18/2010 06:04 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
ACK. I had to double-check MSDN to make sure that threads-win32 already
creates recursive mutex by default.
I don't supposed you read if its possible to make it non-recursive, since
the orginal impl is supposed to be non-recursive !
This patch adds recursive locks necessary due to the processing of
network filter XML that can reference other network filters, including
references that cause looks. Loops in the XML are prevented but their
detection requires recursive locks.
---
src/util/threads-pthread.c | 13
On 03/18/2010 09:15 AM, Stefan Berger wrote:
This patch adds recursive locks necessary due to the processing of
network filter XML that can reference other network filters, including
references that cause looks. Loops in the XML are prevented but their
detection requires recursive locks.
ACK.
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:41:58AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 03/18/2010 09:15 AM, Stefan Berger wrote:
This patch adds recursive locks necessary due to the processing of
network filter XML that can reference other network filters, including
references that cause looks. Loops in the XML
On 03/18/2010 10:51 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:41:58AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 03/18/2010 09:15 AM, Stefan Berger wrote:
This patch adds recursive locks necessary due to the processing of
network filter XML that can reference other network filters, including
Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote on 03/18/2010 12:51:55
PM:
Please respond to Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:41:58AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 03/18/2010 09:15 AM, Stefan Berger wrote:
This patch adds recursive locks necessary due to the processing of
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:04:17AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 03/18/2010 10:51 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:41:58AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 03/18/2010 09:15 AM, Stefan Berger wrote:
This patch adds recursive locks necessary due to the processing of
network
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:16:09AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 03/18/2010 11:04 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
But what does a true non-recursive mutex buy you? The only difference
between recursive and true non-recursive is whether you declare that an
attempt to relock a mutex that you already own
On 03/18/2010 11:04 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
But what does a true non-recursive mutex buy you? The only difference
between recursive and true non-recursive is whether you declare that an
attempt to relock a mutex that you already own is a fatal deadlock
error, rather than incrementing a counter
On 03/18/2010 01:04 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 03/18/2010 10:51 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:41:58AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 03/18/2010 09:15 AM, Stefan Berger wrote:
This patch adds recursive locks necessary due to the processing of
network
10 matches
Mail list logo
