On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 12:59:00 +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 12:55:40 +0100, Ján Tomko wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 05:05:22PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > > Historically iothreads were the first feature and thus didn't have it's
> > > own section. Add them to for
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 12:55:40 +0100, Ján Tomko wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 05:05:22PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > Historically iothreads were the first feature and thus didn't have it's
> > own section. Add them to for consistency with other features.
> >
>
> I'm not convinced
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 05:05:22PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
Historically iothreads were the first feature and thus didn't have it's
own section. Add them to for consistency with other features.
I'm not convinced duplicating this is a good idea - apps looking into
the element for iothread
Historically iothreads were the first feature and thus didn't have it's
own section. Add them to for consistency with other features.
Unfortunately we must keep the original one in place.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa
---
docs/schemas/domaincaps.rng | 3 +++
