On 03/07/19 10:29, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> Except not really. At least for now.
>
> In the future, the firmware will be selected automagically.
> Therefore, it makes no sense to require the pathname of a
> specific firmware binary in the domain XML. But since it is not
> implemented do not reall
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 10:29:14AM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> Except not really. At least for now.
>
> In the future, the firmware will be selected automagically.
> Therefore, it makes no sense to require the pathname of a
> specific firmware binary in the domain XML. But since it is not
> i
Except not really. At least for now.
In the future, the firmware will be selected automagically.
Therefore, it makes no sense to require the pathname of a
specific firmware binary in the domain XML. But since it is not
implemented do not really allow the path to be NULL. Only move
code around to p