On 09/24/13 18:10, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On 13-09-23 02:27 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>
>> If you disagree with this approach (that is: if you think that
>> "224.0.0.0/24" here is not gradual improvement but a step in the wrong
>> direction),
>
> Of course I'm not saying that. I think that's pr
On 13-09-23 02:27 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
If you disagree with this approach (that is: if you think that
"224.0.0.0/24" here is not gradual improvement but a step in the wrong
direction),
Of course I'm not saying that. I think that's pretty clear. The only
point we disagree on is the size o
On 09/23/2013 08:01 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 09/23/13 16:46, Laine Stump wrote:
>
>> 2) Along with 255.255.255.255/32, I think this patch can/should also add
>> a "networkDirectedLocalBroadcast" (which will obviously need to be a
>> local variable and recomputed each time). This can be computed
On 09/23/13 16:46, Laine Stump wrote:
> 2) Along with 255.255.255.255/32, I think this patch can/should also add
> a "networkDirectedLocalBroadcast" (which will obviously need to be a
> local variable and recomputed each time). This can be computed by ORing
> the ip address of the network with ~ne
On 09/23/13 16:40, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On 13-09-23 10:05 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> Packets sent by guests on virbrN, *or* by dnsmasq on the same, to
>> - 255.255.255.255/32 (netmask-independent local network broadcast
>>address), or to
>> - 224.0.0.0/24 (local subnetwork multicast range)
On 09/23/2013 10:05 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> Packets sent by guests on virbrN, *or* by dnsmasq on the same, to
> - 255.255.255.255/32 (netmask-independent local network broadcast
> address), or to
> - 224.0.0.0/24 (local subnetwork multicast range)
> are never forwarded, hence it is not necessar
On 13-09-23 10:05 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
Packets sent by guests on virbrN, *or* by dnsmasq on the same, to
- 255.255.255.255/32 (netmask-independent local network broadcast
address), or to
- 224.0.0.0/24 (local subnetwork multicast range)
All multicast, not just the local subnet multicast n
Packets sent by guests on virbrN, *or* by dnsmasq on the same, to
- 255.255.255.255/32 (netmask-independent local network broadcast
address), or to
- 224.0.0.0/24 (local subnetwork multicast range)
are never forwarded, hence it is not necessary to masquerade them.
In fact we must not masquerade
