On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 07:06:46AM -0400, Mark Wagner wrote:
> On 05/19/2011 03:34 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
Hi Mark,
> I think that maybe I didn't fully understand the entire context.
Well I wasn't sure either if the problem was lack
of expressivity or some problem in the syntax :-)
> My
On 05/19/2011 03:34 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 09:37:21PM -0400, Mark Wagner wrote:
On 05/12/2011 06:45 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 06:22:49PM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
Hi, All
This series adopts Daniel's suggestion on v1, using libnuma but
not
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 03:22:10PM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
> 于 2011年05月19日 15:34, Daniel Veillard 写道:
> >On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 09:37:21PM -0400, Mark Wagner wrote:
> >>On 05/12/2011 06:45 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >>>On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 06:22:49PM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
> Hi, All
于 2011年05月19日 15:34, Daniel Veillard 写道:
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 09:37:21PM -0400, Mark Wagner wrote:
On 05/12/2011 06:45 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 06:22:49PM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
Hi, All
This series adopts Daniel's suggestion on v1, using libnuma but
not invok
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 09:37:21PM -0400, Mark Wagner wrote:
> On 05/12/2011 06:45 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 06:22:49PM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
> >>Hi, All
> >>
> >>This series adopts Daniel's suggestion on v1, using libnuma but
> >>not invoking numactl to set the NU
On 05/12/2011 06:45 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 06:22:49PM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
Hi, All
This series adopts Daniel's suggestion on v1, using libnuma but
not invoking numactl to set the NUMA policy. Add support for
"interleave" and "preferred" modes, except the "stri
于 2011年05月13日 17:42, Daniel P. Berrange 写道:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:01:09PM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
于 2011年05月12日 22:11, Eric Blake 写道:
On 05/12/2011 05:01 AM, Osier Yang wrote:
The new XML is like:
Compatibility with numactl syntax is an explicit non-goal.
numactl is just one pl
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:01:09PM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
> 于 2011年05月12日 22:11, Eric Blake 写道:
> >On 05/12/2011 05:01 AM, Osier Yang wrote:
> The new XML is like:
>
>
>
>
>
> >>>Compatibility with numactl syntax is an explicit non-goal.
> >>>numactl is just one p
于 2011年05月12日 22:11, Eric Blake 写道:
On 05/12/2011 05:01 AM, Osier Yang wrote:
The new XML is like:
Compatibility with numactl syntax is an explicit non-goal.
numactl is just one platform specific impl. Compatibility
with numactl syntax is of no interest to the ESX or VirtualBox
driver
On 05/12/2011 05:01 AM, Osier Yang wrote:
>>> The new XML is like:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Compatibility with numactl syntax is an explicit non-goal.
>> numactl is just one platform specific impl. Compatibility
>> with numactl syntax is of no interest to the ESX or VirtualBox
>> drivers. The
于 2011年05月12日 18:45, Daniel P. Berrange 写道:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 06:22:49PM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
Hi, All
This series adopts Daniel's suggestion on v1, using libnuma but
not invoking numactl to set the NUMA policy. Add support for
"interleave" and "preferred" modes, except the "strict" mo
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 06:22:49PM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
> Hi, All
>
> This series adopts Daniel's suggestion on v1, using libnuma but
> not invoking numactl to set the NUMA policy. Add support for
> "interleave" and "preferred" modes, except the "strict" mode
> supported in v1.
>
> The new XM
Hi, All
This series adopts Daniel's suggestion on v1, using libnuma but
not invoking numactl to set the NUMA policy. Add support for
"interleave" and "preferred" modes, except the "strict" mode
supported in v1.
The new XML is like:
I persist in using the numactl nodeset syntax to represent
13 matches
Mail list logo
