On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 00:13 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 07:38:59AM +0200, Chris Lalancette wrote:
> > Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 10:44:50AM +0200, Chris Lalancette wrote:
> > >> Things that I've missed?
> > >
> > > Maybe a good place for
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 09:22:50AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 01:53:44PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 08:43:44AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek wrote:
> > > > amount of host 'setup'. If a guest is using iSCSI as its storage, then
> > > > there
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 01:53:44PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 08:43:44AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek wrote:
> > > amount of host 'setup'. If a guest is using iSCSI as its storage, then
> > > there is a step where the host has to login to the iSCSI target and create
> > >
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 08:43:44AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek wrote:
> > amount of host 'setup'. If a guest is using iSCSI as its storage, then
> > there is a step where the host has to login to the iSCSI target and create
> > device nodes for the LUNs before the guest can be run. You don't want
> >
> amount of host 'setup'. If a guest is using iSCSI as its storage, then
> there is a step where the host has to login to the iSCSI target and create
> device nodes for the LUNs before the guest can be run. You don't want
> every single host to be logged into all your iSCSI targets all the time.
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 07:38:59AM +0200, Chris Lalancette wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 10:44:50AM +0200, Chris Lalancette wrote:
> >> Things that I've missed?
> >
> > Maybe a good place for this list is on the wiki? On the actual
> > feature/todo page.
> >
> >
CL> I also want to see what KVM does here; however, I don't think that
CL> prevents us from implementing our own, since we would still need
CL> similar things for other hypervisors (Xen, etc.).
Right, I think it's important to include the possibility for the
hypervisor to do its own check. Since
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 10:44:50AM +0200, Chris Lalancette wrote:
>> Things that I've missed?
>
> Maybe a good place for this list is on the wiki? On the actual
> feature/todo page.
>
> I'd like to see where KVM is going to go with this, since it seems
> they are goin
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 10:44:50AM +0200, Chris Lalancette wrote:
> Things that I've missed?
Maybe a good place for this list is on the wiki? On the actual
feature/todo page.
I'd like to see where KVM is going to go with this, since it seems
they are going to implement migration checking.
Rich.
All,
One thing that oVirt would like to have (and that might be useful for other
users) is a call that would do some basic sanity checking for live migration.
This call would go over to the remote libvirtd, do some checks, and
return whether we think migration is likely to succeed. Note that
10 matches
Mail list logo
