Re: [libvirt] Schedule for the next release suggestions

2013-03-22 Thread Michal Privoznik
On 22.03.2013 15:38, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 02:23:34PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:17:07PM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 02:07:05PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 09:36:03PM +0800

Re: [libvirt] Schedule for the next release suggestions

2013-03-22 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 02:23:34PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:17:07PM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 02:07:05PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 09:36:03PM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > > > The 1.0.3 r

Re: [libvirt] Schedule for the next release suggestions

2013-03-22 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:17:07PM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 02:07:05PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 09:36:03PM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > > The 1.0.3 release was on the 5th March, and right now we have > > > accumulated 'only'

Re: [libvirt] Schedule for the next release suggestions

2013-03-22 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 02:07:05PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 09:36:03PM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > The 1.0.3 release was on the 5th March, and right now we have > > accumulated 'only' 150 commits since the release. Based on this I > > would suggest to wait

Re: [libvirt] Schedule for the next release suggestions

2013-03-22 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 02:50:22PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote: > On 22.03.2013 14:36, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > The 1.0.3 release was on the 5th March, and right now we have > > accumulated 'only' 150 commits since the release. Based on this I > > would suggest to wait a couple of weeks befor

Re: [libvirt] Schedule for the next release suggestions

2013-03-22 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 09:36:03PM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote: > The 1.0.3 release was on the 5th March, and right now we have > accumulated 'only' 150 commits since the release. Based on this I > would suggest to wait a couple of weeks before to enter a freeze > for the following release. This

Re: [libvirt] Schedule for the next release suggestions

2013-03-22 Thread Michal Privoznik
On 22.03.2013 14:36, Daniel Veillard wrote: > The 1.0.3 release was on the 5th March, and right now we have > accumulated 'only' 150 commits since the release. Based on this I > would suggest to wait a couple of weeks before to enter a freeze > for the following release. This mean we drift from t

[libvirt] Schedule for the next release suggestions

2013-03-22 Thread Daniel Veillard
The 1.0.3 release was on the 5th March, and right now we have accumulated 'only' 150 commits since the release. Based on this I would suggest to wait a couple of weeks before to enter a freeze for the following release. This mean we drift from the usual end of month, but the ratio of freeze/devel