Hello,
On 04/01/2014 10:44 PM, Wilson, Andrew wrote:
In a legal system where PD is not recognized, e.g. Europe, then the effective
portion of CC0 is presumably not
the PD declaration but the permissive license. As other posters have noted,
that permissive license
is not perceptibly different
Kuno Woud wrote:
On 04/01/2014 10:44 PM, Wilson, Andrew wrote:
In a legal system where PD is not recognized, e.g. Europe, then the
effective portion of CC0 is presumably not the PD declaration but the
permissive license. As other posters have noted, that permissive license is
not
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Wilson, Andrew andrew.wil...@intel.comwrote:
with the distinctive feature that it explicitly disclaims patent licensing
IMHO, in the current legal climate, that is not a distinctive feature, it
is a distinctive bug.
Luis
Wilson, Andrew scripsit:
Interesting point, though. I'd speculate that if the embedded
public license fallback inside CC0 is ever sent to OSI as a
stand-alone license, it would be approved. It is mighty similar
in effect to MIT/BSD/Apache, with the distinctive feature that it
explicitly
4 matches
Mail list logo
