Re: [License-discuss] Source-attribution licenses and Javascript compatibility

I agree completely with Philippe; a statement such as you proposed does not modify the license, but it indicates to downstream consumers the scenarios under which they could expect you to (potentially) enforce the attribution requirement, and situations under which you do not intend to enforce the

Re: [License-discuss] Source-attribution licenses and Javascript compatibility

On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Andi McClure wrote: > I am working on some projects (a programming language, a game library) for > which I wish to use a "source attribution" license-- for example, the zlib > license, or the 2-clause BSD license if I could somehow delete

Re: [License-discuss] Source-attribution licenses and Javascript compatibility

Andi McClure wrote: > The zlib license refers to "source distributions". The BSD license refers to > "redistributions of source code". Neither license defines "source code". > Without a definition, how do I (or someone who uses my project) know whether > cases #2 and #3 are "source