David Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Considering a GPL-compatible v2 of the QPL wasn't good enough.
Eh? Who would not have been satisfied with a genuinely GPL-compatible
QPL?
--
__
\/ o\ Employ me! Cryptology, security, Perl, Linux, TCP/IP, and smarts.
/\__/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
haracterise the beliefs you're discussing fairly and
evenly, even where you disagree: I'm sure you'd find irksome an
article that constrasted the "wanting software that doesn't take away
freedom" category with the "it works better, so who cares?" camp.
--
__
\/ o\ [EMAIL P
, or both?
--
__
\/ o\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Got a Linux strategy? \ /
/\__/ Paul Crowley http://www.hedonism.demon.co.uk/paul/ /~\
3 matches
Mail list logo