Re: Qt and the GPL

2000-09-05 Thread Paul Crowley
David Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Considering a GPL-compatible v2 of the QPL wasn't good enough. Eh? Who would not have been satisfied with a genuinely GPL-compatible QPL? -- __ \/ o\ Employ me! Cryptology, security, Perl, Linux, TCP/IP, and smarts. /\__/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Essay RFC delayed.

1999-08-24 Thread Paul Crowley
haracterise the beliefs you're discussing fairly and evenly, even where you disagree: I'm sure you'd find irksome an article that constrasted the "wanting software that doesn't take away freedom" category with the "it works better, so who cares?" camp. -- __ \/ o\ [EMAIL P

Re: RFC soon on essay Does Free Software Production in a Bazaar obey the Law of Diminishing Returns?

1999-08-22 Thread Paul Crowley
, or both? -- __ \/ o\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Got a Linux strategy? \ / /\__/ Paul Crowley http://www.hedonism.demon.co.uk/paul/ /~\