> -Original Message-
> From: License-discuss [mailto:license-discuss-boun...@opensource.org] On
> Behalf Of Tzeng, Nigel H.
> Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2017 12:10 PM
> To: license-discuss@opensource.org
> Subject: Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: (no
Cem,
I think I’ve mentioned this in the past but GOSS needs not be bazaar style open
development. Cathedral development that simply open sources the resulting
product still has tremendous value to the community.
From that perspective CLAs, and dealing with external contributions are a
> -Original Message-
> From: License-discuss [mailto:license-discuss-boun...@opensource.org] On
> Behalf Of John Cowan
> Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2017 11:28 AM
> To: license-discuss@opensource.org
> Subject: Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: (no subject)
&
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US) <
cem.f.karan@mail.mil> wrote:
> The issue is that
> 'voluntary' doesn't mean the same thing as 'gratuitous'; I work for the
> Government on a voluntary, but not gratuitous basis.
I certainly hope that nobody in the
> -Original Message-
> From: License-discuss [mailto:license-discuss-boun...@opensource.org] On
> Behalf Of Ben Hilburn
> Sent: Friday, September 01, 2017 2:06 PM
> To: license-discuss@opensource.org
> Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [License-discuss] (no subject)
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: License-discuss [mailto:license-discuss-boun...@opensource.org] On
> Behalf Of Tom Bereknyei
> Sent: Friday, September 01, 2017 9:48 AM
> To: license-discuss@opensource.org
> Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [License-discuss] (no subject)
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
