Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] The License Talking-About List

2016-08-25 Thread Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
To: license-discuss@opensource.org > Subject: Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] The License Talking-About > List > > All active links contained in this email were disabled. Please verify the > identity of the sender, and confirm the authenticity of all links > contained w

Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] The License Talking-About List

2016-08-24 Thread Rick Moen
[cross-post to license-review, snipped.] Quoting Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US) (cem.f.karan@mail.mil): > What about GitHub? Using a proprietary hosting platform for outsourced tracking of open-source licenses? Could work, but that risks punishment by the Gods of Irony. BTW, at

Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] The License Talking-About List

2016-08-24 Thread Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
What about GitHub? There have been suggestions on the Python-ideas list to do this for any new python ideas. The idea is simple; each license becomes its own project. Issues can then be tracked via the issue tracker, making it easy to segregate the issues into individual threads, and as issue