Re: [License-discuss] OSI approved license without original license and reproduction of notices required in redistributions?

2012-07-16 Thread Bruce Perens
There are two different fundamental forms of copyright regime. One is based upon the right to copy, and the other is based upon the moral rights of authors. A number of European nations, for example, are moral rights regimes, while the U.S. is based upon the right to copy. However, even in the

Re: [License-discuss] OSI approved license without original license and reproduction of notices required in redistributions?

2012-07-16 Thread Johnny Solbu
On Monday 16 July 2012 16:30, Casey Rodarmor wrote: > Ah, is it to avoid a situation where an author might be pressured into > waiving that right? That is one of the reasons, yes. There is quite a few statues throuth our law that prohibit waiver's in certain situations. :-)= -- Johnny A. Solbu

Re: [License-discuss] OSI approved license without original license and reproduction of notices required in redistributions?

2012-07-16 Thread Casey Rodarmor
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Johnny Solbu wrote: > The reasoning behind it is to give credit to the authors. To ensure that > happens, the law make it as a statutory requirement. The author cannot waive > this right. Ah, is it to avoid a situation where an author might be pressured into wa

Re: [License-discuss] OSI approved license without original license and reproduction of notices required in redistributions?

2012-07-16 Thread Chris Travers
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Johnny Solbu wrote: > On Monday 16 July 2012 15:43, Casey Rodarmor wrote: >> > (As an example, we are legaly required to give credit to King James as the >> > author when we redistribute the old 1611 KJV Bible.) >> >> This kind of blew my mind. What are the benefi

Re: [License-discuss] OSI approved license without original license and reproduction of notices required in redistributions?

2012-07-16 Thread Johnny Solbu
On Monday 16 July 2012 15:43, Casey Rodarmor wrote: > > (As an example, we are legaly required to give credit to King James as the > > author when we redistribute the old 1611 KJV Bible.) > > This kind of blew my mind. What are the benefits--supposed or > otherwise--of such a law? The reasoning

Re: [License-discuss] OSI approved license without original license and reproduction of notices required in redistributions?

2012-07-16 Thread Casey Rodarmor
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Johnny Solbu wrote: > Unless you explicitly transfer the copyright to someone else, You are the > copyrights holder. Don't confuse copyrights with licensing. That's a very good point. I think I confuse licensing with transferring copyright sometimes. > (As an ex

Re: [License-discuss] OSI approved license without original license and reproduction of notices required in redistributions?

2012-07-16 Thread Casey Rodarmor
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Rick Moen wrote: > Perhaps you should use Apache License v. 2.0 with an accomanying > statement that you as copyright owner waive all conditions cited in > section 4. Something like: > > Copyright 2012 by Casey Rodarmor . > > Licensed under the Apache License,

Re: [License-discuss] OSI approved license without original license and reproduction of notices required in redistributions?

2012-07-05 Thread Johnny Solbu
On Monday 02 July 2012 17:40, Casey Rodarmor wrote: > It seems that if I am the original copyright holder and I specifically allow > for it in the license, > alteration of the copyright notices Unless you explicitly transfer the copyright to someone else, You are the copyrights holder. Don't co

Re: [License-discuss] OSI approved license without original license and reproduction of notices required in redistributions?

2012-07-05 Thread Casey Rodarmor
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote: > Nope. The obligation to keep the copyright statement intact is typically > required by law (see 17 USC section 506(c)(d) or your local equivalent), and > the obligation to keep the license terms & disclaimer intact is a standard > component o

Re: [License-discuss] OSI approved license without original license and reproduction of notices required in redistributions?

2012-07-02 Thread Rick Moen
Quoting Casey Rodarmor (ca...@rodarmor.com): > I would like to release my work without any restrictions whatsoever. It appears that many people seek to do this. Unfortunately, since the nearly universal of the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (an international

Re: [License-discuss] OSI approved license without original license and reproduction of notices required in redistributions?

2012-07-02 Thread Karl Fogel
Chuck Swiger writes: >It sounds like you're looking for "public domain", which may or may >not be available depending on your local law. Since public domain >isn't always well-defined or available, using a simple permissive >license is the next best thing. Speaking of which, see http://openso

Re: [License-discuss] OSI approved license without original license and reproduction of notices required in redistributions?

2012-07-02 Thread Chuck Swiger
On 7/2/2012 11:40 AM, Casey Rodarmor wrote: On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote: Nope. The obligation to keep the copyright statement intact is typically required by law (see 17 USC section 506(c)(d) or your local equivalent), and the obligation to keep the license terms& disc

Re: [License-discuss] OSI approved license without original license and reproduction of notices required in redistributions?

2012-07-02 Thread Chuck Swiger
On 7/1/2012 10:42 PM, Casey Rodarmor wrote: Is there an OSI approved license that does not require that the original license be included even in trivial redistributions, and does not require reproduction of any copyright, attribution, and other notices that may be present in the original work?

[License-discuss] OSI approved license without original license and reproduction of notices required in redistributions?

2012-07-01 Thread Casey Rodarmor
Hi there, Is there an OSI approved license that does not require that the original license be included even in trivial redistributions, and does not require reproduction of any copyright, attribution, and other notices that may be present in the original work? I would like to release my work with