Re: [License-discuss] Source-attribution licenses and Javascript compatibility

I agree completely with Philippe; a statement such as you proposed does not modify the license, but it indicates to downstream consumers the scenarios under which they could expect you to (potentially) enforce the attribution requirement, and situations under which you do not intend to enforce the

Re: [License-discuss] Source-attribution licenses and Javascript compatibility

On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Andi McClure wrote: > I am working on some projects (a programming language, a game library) for > which I wish to use a "source attribution" license-- for example, the zlib > license, or the 2-clause BSD license if I could somehow delete

Re: [License-discuss] Source-attribution licenses and Javascript compatibility

cess by You for as long as Licensor continues to distribute the Original Work. OSL 3.0 <https://opensource.org/licenses/osl-3.0> § 3. /Larry From: Andi McClure [mailto:andi.m.mccl...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 7:06 PM To: license-discuss@opensource.org Subject:

Re: [License-discuss] Source-attribution licenses and Javascript compatibility

On 20/05/16 03:06, Andi McClure wrote: "For purposes of the above license, 'source' is defined as the preferred form for making modifications to the code. In other words, minified Javascript which is not intended to be modified does not count as a 'source distribution'." …and if I included

Re: [License-discuss] Source-attribution licenses and Javascript compatibility

Andi McClure scripsit: > The zlib license refers to "source distributions". The BSD license refers > to "redistributions of source code". Neither license defines "source code". [...] > The Apache and MPL licenses *do* define "source code" (both say something > like "the form of the work

[License-discuss] Source-attribution licenses and Javascript compatibility

I am working on some projects (a programming language, a game library) for which I wish to use a "source attribution" license-- for example, the zlib license, or the 2-clause BSD license if I could somehow delete the second clause. I want people redistributing or reusing source code from my