On Saturday 09 February 2002 01:26 pm, Christian Gross wrote:
Can someone please tell me what the difference is and why the APSL is
considered Open Source and why the Microsoft License is not?
The APSL allows you to use the software for commercial use, provide you
submit any modifications
Please excuse my ignorance again... But here is the paragraph from the APSL
2.1 You may use, reproduce, display, perform, modify and distribute
Original Code, with or without Modifications, solely for Your internal
research and development and/or Personal Use, provided that in each instance:
(Sorry my email cut me off by accident)
Please excuse my ignorance again... But here is the paragraph from the APSL
2.1 You may use, reproduce, display, perform, modify and distribute
Original Code, with or without Modifications, solely for Your internal
research and development and/or
At 15:29 09/02/2002 -0800, David Johnson wrote:
On Saturday 09 February 2002 02:48 pm, Christian Gross wrote:
2.1 You may use, reproduce, display, perform, modify and distribute
Original Code, with or without Modifications, solely for Your internal
research and development and/or Personal
On Saturday 09 February 2002 03:32 pm, Christian Gross wrote:
I saw that too and I thought hey no problem. But then 2.2.a explicitly
states:
(a) You must satisfy all the conditions of Section 2.1 with respect to the
Source Code of the Covered Code;
Which would say, sure you can deploy
5 matches
Mail list logo
