Thanks for the feedback so far!
By without fee I meant that copyright holder(s) were not imposing a fee;
this was confusing and unnecessary so I removed it.
I see what you meant meant about the rights not specifically granted are
reserved being superfluous. I've removed it for now, but might
These terms will make it not GPL compatible because
the GPL is not identical to these terms. Maybe
something like the source code (including any
modifications) must be made available to the
recipients under these terms or the terms of the GNU
General Public License...
--- Bruce Dodson [EMAIL
Bruce Dodson wrote:
disclaimers appear in supporting documentation. When you
distribute this software outside your organization, the source
code (including any modifications) must be made available to the
recipients under these license terms.
You have not defined the copyleft
: Saturday, July 13, 2002 5:40 AM
Subject: Re: copyleft lite?
These terms will make it not GPL compatible because
the GPL is not identical to these terms. Maybe
something like the source code (including any
modifications) must be made available to the
recipients under these terms or the terms
Seems to me that it is not GPL compatible. The GPL expressly
prohibits combining with licenses that have more restrictive terms
than the GPL.
without fee is a restriction the GPL does not include.
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
Bruce Dodson wrote:
All rights not specifically granted in this agreement are reserved
to the copyright holder(s).
That one line is superfluous. That is what the statute book says.
Since it there in the statute book, this is how it will be, whether you
say it or not.
Your rights to
Mahesh T Pai wrote:
That one line is superfluous. That is what the statute book says.
Since it there in the statute book, this is how it will be, whether you
say it or not.
IANAL, but isn't that true only until they change the statute book?
In other words, isn't there something to be said
I'm trying for a simple, easy-to-read license with some degree of copyleft.
I hope it will be compatible with the GPL also. Please take a look at the
following, and help me find any flaws.
Thanks,
Bruce
__
software program name.
Copyright (c) year(s) copyright holder(s). All
8 matches
Mail list logo