Re: [jcollins@asgardsrealm.net: Re: Re[2]: [Licq-main] licq with iptables]

2002-06-07 Thread Jamin W . Collins
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002 23:28:50 +0100 "Darren Evans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is it me or is this not straight forward? I guess not as it's not in > the FAQ. > > A standard firewall generally denies all traffic by default, right? > So in order to enable functionality, what ports and hosts does

Re: [jcollins@asgardsrealm.net: Re: Re[2]: [Licq-main] licq with iptables]

2002-06-07 Thread Darren Evans
Jamin W.Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> TvE> Subject: Re: Re[2]: [Licq-main] licq with iptables TvE> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TvE> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) TvE> On Fri, 7 Jun 2002 22:38:10 +0100 TvE> "Darren Evans" <[EMAIL PR

Re: Re[2]: [Licq-main] licq with iptables

2002-06-07 Thread Jamin W . Collins
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002 22:38:10 +0100 "Darren Evans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Thomas, thanks for your email. I don't think it's unprecise. > > TCP and UDP ports that should be allowed so that licq can function > in all configurations. Perhaps it is seen as "unprecise" as there is no "specif

Re[2]: [Licq-main] licq with iptables

2002-06-07 Thread Darren Evans
Friday, June 7, 2002, 10:33:18 PM, you wrote: TR> On Friday 07 June 2002 20:04, Darren Evans wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Can someone tell me tell me the best way to firewall >> >> * client to client and >> * server to server >> >> licq so that there is some firewalling. I noticed that there >> has been