Awesome, I just looked at the Flot+Comet stuff, some cool stuff could
be done with that.
Nice stuff Dave and Francois!
On Jan 6, 8:15 pm, "David Pollak"
wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I've just updated the Flot widget (which is pretty cool) to be more
> Lift-like.
>
> I've changed Option to Box to be cons
> Also, I'd like to do some code cleanup (e.g., changing Option to Box) in the
> flot widget. Is that okay?
Yes, it is OK.
Any other suggestions are welcome
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Lift"
I agree.
Also, I'd like to do some code cleanup (e.g., changing Option to Box) in the
flot widget. Is that okay?
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 12:09 AM, Marius wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In lift-widgets/test folder we have a test lift application where we
> demo all the widgets. To me it makes more sense to h
Hi,
In lift-widgets/test folder we have a test lift application where we
demo all the widgets. To me it makes more sense to have the flot demo
application here rather then sites since people can see all available
widgets in a single place.
To run the lift-widgets test application just go in lift
Hi Marius:
I guess I can do it, but I need to understand exactly what you mean by
"lift-widget test application".
Currently the flot widget sources consist in:
- the main source at
http://github.com/dpp/liftweb/tree/master/lift-widgets/src/main/scala/net/liftweb/widgets/flot
- a webapp demo a
> I'm not saying Option is bad Can is good ... not by far. But Can is
> more liftish even if you do not use Failure. It has some handy
> artifacts that option does not. Neverthelesse there is and implicit
> conversion from Option to Can and vice-versa. No biggie ... just
> wondering.
>
Keep wond
On Nov 1, 11:09 pm, Francois Bertrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Marius
>
> > 1. I was wondering why the use of Option and not Can ?
>
> Because I didn't need the "Failure" part of Can.
I'm not saying Option is bad Can is good ... not by far. But Can is
more liftish even if you do not use
Hi Marius
> 1. I was wondering why the use of Option and not Can ?
Because I didn't need the "Failure" part of Can.
> 2. Any particular reason for using StringBuilder in
> FlotOverview.render and not JsExp composition (same for Flot
> object)? ... it just seamed easier? .. renderHide and render
Nice.
1. I was wondering why the use of Option and not Can ?
2. Any particular reason for using StringBuilder in
FlotOverview.render and not JsExp composition (same for Flot
object)? ... it just seamed easier? .. renderHide and renderShow
functions... I think Lift has abstractions for those as we
