I dont disagree - I was just wanting to comment on the consistency of the API
:-)
Cheers, Tim
On 25 Nov 2009, at 23:26, David Pollak wrote:
> I'm not opposed to adding a skipXmlThingy style as well, but giving the
> developer a generic function for inserting this XML top-matter is the higher
I'm not opposed to adding a skipXmlThingy style as well, but giving the
developer a generic function for inserting this XML top-matter is the higher
priority.
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Timothy Perrett wrote:
> David,
>
> I read harry's other email with interest - and thinking about it, it
David,
I read harry's other email with interest - and thinking about it, it seems this
style of implementation differs quite significantly from S.skipDocType. It
strikes me that a LiftRules configuration is our usual idiom; is there a reason
that S.skipDocType falls out of this?
One way or an
object excludeXmlHeaderStuff extends RequestVar(false)
in boot:
val current = LiftRules.calculateXmlHeader
LiftRules.calculateXmlHeader = (resp, node, contentType) => if
(excludeXmlHeaderStuff) "" else current(resp, node, contentType)
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 2:09 PM, harryh wrote:
> It is no
It is not 100% obvious to me how I would, after this change is
submitted, avoid sending an header when serving pages under a
certain path.
Should we be adding something similar to S.skipDocType
(S.skipXmlHeader)?
-harryh
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro
http://reviewboard.liftweb.net/r/124/
On Nov 24, 3:40 pm, David Pollak
wrote:
> I've created issue 207:http://github.com/dpp/liftweb/issues/#issue/207
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:34 PM, harryh wrote:
> > > It will eliminate both the doctype and the thing.
>
> > This does not appear to be
I've created issue 207: http://github.com/dpp/liftweb/issues/#issue/207
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:34 PM, harryh wrote:
> > It will eliminate both the doctype and the thing.
>
> This does not appear to be the case. I just tried it (on M7). Also
> looking at the code for NodeResponse this does
> It will eliminate both the doctype and the thing.
This does not appear to be the case. I just tried it (on M7). Also
looking at the code for NodeResponse this does not appear to be what
the code is doing.
-harryh
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:22 PM, harryh wrote:
> That will skip the DOCTYPE though right?
> I'm looking to avoid sending the XML header ( encoding="UTF-8"?>)
>
It will eliminate both the doctype and the thing.
If you just need to the XML header removed, please open a ticket and we'll
add a Li
That will skip the DOCTYPE though right?
I'm looking to avoid sending the XML header ()
-harryh
On Nov 23, 3:03 pm, David Pollak
wrote:
> If you set S.skipDocType = false during the processing of the request for
> these devices, the stuff will be omitted.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 11:49 A
10 matches
Mail list logo
