[Lift] Re: What is going to be in Lift 1.1

2009-10-15 Thread Derek Chen-Becker
I already have a couple of tickets open to fix up some bugs in MS SQL server and Oracle support, so those are good targets. On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 9:29 AM, David Pollak wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:08 AM, Jacek Furmankiewicz wrote: > >> >> Will REST support include integrated JAX-RS a

[Lift] Re: What is going to be in Lift 1.1

2009-10-15 Thread David Pollak
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:08 AM, Jacek Furmankiewicz wrote: > > Will REST support include integrated JAX-RS and JAXB? Or are you > planning to not use those existing stacks and replace them with > something Scala/Lift-specific? > > This thread is the discussion of the what is going to be in 1.1, n

[Lift] Re: What is going to be in Lift 1.1

2009-10-15 Thread Jacek Furmankiewicz
Will REST support include integrated JAX-RS and JAXB? Or are you planning to not use those existing stacks and replace them with something Scala/Lift-specific? I personally like both of them as they take care of a lot of plumbing transparently (.e.g. switching output from JSON to XML depending on

[Lift] Re: What is going to be in Lift 1.1

2009-10-15 Thread Jonathan Ferguson
Being able to unit test record/mapper classes and the code that depends on them would be wonderful. Cheers Jono 2009/10/15 David Pollak > > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Timothy Perrett > wrote: > >> Agreed on all fronts. Points 1 -> 4 are pretty key for me and the projects >> that run on

[Lift] Re: What is going to be in Lift 1.1

2009-10-15 Thread Peter Robinett
Hi David, That sounds like a great list, especially (in my case) the Record, lift-json, OAuth, and REST support. Peter Robinett On Oct 14, 11:27 pm, David Pollak wrote: > Folks, > I'd like to get everyone's input on what Lift 1.1 will contain.  Here's my > list: > >    - Wizard working to the

[Lift] Re: What is going to be in Lift 1.1

2009-10-14 Thread monty chen
That is great for lift 1.1. but I suggest to improve doc. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, s

[Lift] Re: What is going to be in Lift 1.1

2009-10-14 Thread David Pollak
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Timothy Perrett wrote: > Agreed on all fronts. Points 1 -> 4 are pretty key for me and the projects > that run on lift at work. > > So, the million dollar question: ETA's of this stuff? Scala 2.8.2 (based on > our previous conversation about not using 2.8.0) is sti

[Lift] Re: What is going to be in Lift 1.1

2009-10-14 Thread Timothy Perrett
Agreed on all fronts. Points 1 -> 4 are pretty key for me and the projects that run on lift at work. So, the million dollar question: ETA's of this stuff? Scala 2.8.2 (based on our previous conversation about not using 2.8.0) is still some time off right? Cheers, Tim On 14 Oct 2009, at 22: