Maybe most of you have seen it:
http://max-l.github.com/Squeryl/
Br's,
Marius
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
liftweb+unsub
Yeah. It's good stuff. Would love to see it integrated with Mapper/Record
(so it's not looking at var fields, but looking at the more complex objects
that represent fields).
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Marius wrote:
> Maybe most of you have seen it:
>
>
> http://max-l.github.com/Squeryl/
Agreed - its nice. The var's are a little unsettling though... shame there is
not a way to make it more immutable.
Cheers, Tim
On 24 Feb 2010, at 17:35, David Pollak wrote:
> Yeah. It's good stuff. Would love to see it integrated with Mapper/Record
> (so it's not looking at var fields, but
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Timothy Perrett wrote:
> Agreed - its nice. The var's are a little unsettling though... shame there
> is not a way to make it more immutable.
>
Wouldn't the new copy functionality of case classes in 2.8 take care of
that? I've been drooling over this and the migr
