Hey Naftoli,
Man, it would be great *not to* mix up 2.7 and 2.8 codes inline.
Keeping it in sync with master would get very confusing and error prone
(personally I don't find that aesthetically pleasing either).
In fact, with some adjustment, it's possible to have parts of code
friendly
Could you give me exact instructions what to do to test my code on 2.8?
Thanks.
2010/2/7 David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote:
So if I get around to it would it indeed be preferable to point it to
SHtml?
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote:
Could you give me exact instructions what to do to test my code on 2.8?
git checkout -b 280_port_refresh origin/280_port_refresh
cd framework/lift-persistence/lift-mapper
emacs $(grep -l FIXME: 280 $(find . -name
Sorry - what's the Windows (eclipse) equivalent--i.e., what does that line do?
Also I wasn't sure what you meant by 'comments around my code.'
Thanks!
-
David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote:
Sorry - what's the Windows (eclipse) equivalent--i.e., what does that line
do?
Find all the files that contain FIXME: 280 in the mapper package.
Also I wasn't sure what you meant by 'comments around my code.'
It
Never mind, I go your intent. Thanks.
-
David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote:
Could you give me exact instructions what to do to test my code on 2.8?
git checkout -b
Thanks
-
David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote:
Sorry - what's the Windows (eclipse) equivalent--i.e., what does that line
do?
Find all the files that contain FIXME:
Never mind, apparently I wasn't up to date.
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote:
I got OneToMany to compile (not in a way that would work on 2.7 though).
Then I tried to push it:
naft...@naftoli-pc /c/dev/gitrepo/liftweb (280_port_refresh)
$ git
Hello. Why do Mapper's toForm implementations use S.fmapFunc directly rather
than using SHtml? Is it not duplicate code?
Thanks.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
To
So if I get around to it would it indeed be preferable to point it to SHtml?
-
David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello. Why do Mapper's toForm implementations use
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote:
So if I get around to it would it indeed be preferable to point it to
SHtml?
Changing the code is one of the lowest priorities I could imagine. I would
say that closing the stuff you've had on review board for 1
Sure. It came up as part of those.
The RB about TableEditor has been waiting for a Ship it for a while, and the
one about ConversionRules is pretty much done locally -- some questions on
Mapper's usage of it are on the list waiting for a good answer.
-
David
12 matches
Mail list logo