Hey Lisa,
> One drawback is that it adds another reason an RBF attempt
> might be rejected.
That's true, but not including it is also a reason for an RBF attempt
to be rejected! If the seller changed their mind (because the tx took
too much time to confirm and they want to allocate their
> Each RBF attempt renegotiates a potential liquidity purchase,
independently of what the previous attempts contained.
You're right, I'm missing the RBF spec! Thanks for the reminder.
I think having the lease renegotiated makes sense, it gives
maximum flexibility and allows the API for an
Hey Lisa,
Thanks for the update! I believe that moving to CLTV instead of CSV is
definitely the right move here.
Regarding the newly added 2nd-stage lease locked transactions, I don't
think that works. The issue is that you don't have an opportunity to
receive signatures for those transactions
Hi all.
The original Liquidity Ads spec draft[1] was posted a few years ago and
implemented
and shipped in core-lightning's v0.10.1 (Aug 2021).
We received some great comments and feedback on the initial design,
and I've since updated the spec to incorporate some of these changes.
Big thanks
