Re: [Lightning-dev] Removing lnd's source code from the Lightning specs repository

Good morning again list, > > > We could use an identicon, we do that with the lightningnetwork repository. > > An official logo is probably better - give the project a real symbol. > > I attached an SVG file I have been working on for some time, for the > amusement of all. > > It is unfortunatel

Re: [Lightning-dev] Removing lnd's source code from the Lightning specs repository

Good morning list, > We could use an identicon, we do that with the lightningnetwork repository. > An official logo is probably better - give the project a real symbol. I attached an SVG file I have been working on for some time, for the amusement of all. It is unfortunately not square, and is

Re: [Lightning-dev] Removing lnd's source code from the Lightning specs repository

We could use an identicon, we do that with the lightningnetwork repository. An official logo is probably better - give the project a real symbol. On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 10:37 PM Olaoluwa Osuntokun wrote: > Oh, also there's currently this sort of placeholder logo from waaay back > that's used as

Re: [Lightning-dev] Removing lnd's source code from the Lightning specs repository

Oh, also there's currently this sort of placeholder logo from waaay back that's used as the org's avatar/image. Perhaps it's time we roll an "official" logo/avatar? Otherwise we can just switch over the randomly generated blocks thingy that Github uses when an account/org has no avatar. -- Laolu

Re: [Lightning-dev] Removing lnd's source code from the Lightning specs repository

Circling back to close the loop here: * The new Github org (https://github.com/lightning) now exists, and all the major implementation maintainers have been added to the organization as admins. * A new blips repo (https://github.com/lightning/blips) has been created to continue th

Re: [Lightning-dev] Removing lnd's source code from the Lightning specs repository

On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 at 21:57, Olaoluwa Osuntokun wrote: > Also note that lnd has _never_ referred to itself as the "reference" > implementation. A few years ago some other implementations adopted that > title themselves, but have since adopted softer language. I don't remember that but if you're

Re: [Lightning-dev] Removing lnd's source code from the Lightning specs repository

On 10/12/21 12:57, Olaoluwa Osuntokun wrote: Hi Fabrice, > I believe that was a mistake: a few days ago, Arcane Research published a > fairly detailed report on the state of the Lightning Network: > https://twitter.com/ArcaneResearch/status/1445442967582302213

Re: [Lightning-dev] Removing lnd's source code from the Lightning specs repository

Love the idea of moving the specs etc to github.com/lightning, thanks so much for generously offering to donate this Laolu. Strong ACK from me. Given how difficult the existing org is wrt ownership etc, moving to a new one makes a lot of sense to me. Thanks Fabrice for bringing this up so we coul

Re: [Lightning-dev] Removing lnd's source code from the Lightning specs repository

While I don't partake in the conversations too often, I just want to say I strongly support Olaoluwa suggestion. AFAIAA there's a lot of automations, dependencies, dockerfiles, or direct links to files that rely on the location of lnd github repo, and I'm sure not all of it would be able to handle

Re: [Lightning-dev] Removing lnd's source code from the Lightning specs repository

Hi Fabrice, > I believe that was a mistake: a few days ago, Arcane Research published a > fairly detailed report on the state of the Lightning Network: > https://twitter.com/ArcaneResearch/status/1445442967582302213. They > obviously did some real work there, and seem to imply that their report >

Re: [Lightning-dev] Removing lnd's source code from the Lightning specs repository

On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 at 01:14, Martin Habovštiak wrote: > > I can confirm I moved a repository few months ago and all links kept working > fine. > Yes, github makes it really easy, and you keep your issues, PRs, stars, .. depending on your dev/packaging you may need to rename packages (something

Re: [Lightning-dev] Removing lnd's source code from the Lightning specs repository

I can confirm I moved a repository few months ago and all links kept working fine. On Mon, Oct 11, 2021, 20:58 Matt Corallo wrote: > > > On 10/11/21 05:29, Bryan Bishop wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 12:25 AM Andrés G. Aragoneses > > > wrote: > > > > Completely

Re: [Lightning-dev] Removing lnd's source code from the Lightning specs repository

On 10/11/21 05:29, Bryan Bishop wrote: On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 12:25 AM Andrés G. Aragoneses mailto:kno...@gmail.com>> wrote: Completely agree with this. How to move this forward? Set up a vote? What would be the reasoning for not moving it? One consideration is broken links, which

Re: [Lightning-dev] Removing lnd's source code from the Lightning specs repository

On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 12:25 AM Andrés G. Aragoneses wrote: > Completely agree with this. How to move this forward? Set up a vote? What > would be the reasoning for not moving it? > One consideration is broken links, which can be solved by a soft note in a README somewhere. - Bryan https://twi

Re: [Lightning-dev] Removing lnd's source code from the Lightning specs repository

Completely agree with this. How to move this forward? Set up a vote? What would be the reasoning for not moving it? On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 at 23:25, Fabrice Drouin wrote: > Hello, > > When you navigate to https://github.com/lightningnetwork/ you find > - the Lightning Network white paper > - the Lig

[Lightning-dev] Removing lnd's source code from the Lightning specs repository

Hello, When you navigate to https://github.com/lightningnetwork/ you find - the Lightning Network white paper - the Lightning Network specifications - and ... the source code for lnd! This has been an anomaly for years, which has created some confusion between Lightning the open-source protocol a