On Wednesday 07 November 2007 21:39:23 Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 02:03 +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > As a composer by myself, it's a mystery to me why so many composers
> > love to use 128th and 256th, most time for no good reason.
>
> Let's ask ourselves about that wel
On Nov 7, 2007 7:03 PM, Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Please, please just don't get rid of the *beamed* 128ths and 256ths;
> > I use them both all the time.
>
> This is something you should get punished for :-)
>
:-D
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 02:03 +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> As a composer by myself, it's a mystery to me why so many composers
> love to use 128th and 256th, most time for no good reason.
Let's ask ourselves about that well-known piano hack, Ludwig van
Beethoven. Later we'll turn to Mozart, who d
> Please, please just don't get rid of the *beamed* 128ths and 256ths;
> I use them both all the time.
This is something you should get punished for :-)
A longer time ago we performed the excellent opera `Luci mie
traditrici' from Salvatore Sciarrino which uses 32nd-tuplets all the
time. The sc
Ok, I feel quite silly about this. How do we copy stuff into
out-www/offline-root ?
In GDP, we have a new directory
input/lsr/pitches/
(replacing the old input/lsr/pitch )
when I build the docs, I get out-www/collated-files.html in that
directory with no problems. But the entire dir fails t
Till Rettig wrote:
./introduction.texi:1099: ==> Fatal error occurred, no output PDF
file produce
d!
Transcript written on lilypond-learning.log.
/usr/local/bin/texi2dvi: pdfetex exited with bad status, quitting.
make[3]: *** [out-www/lilypond-learning.pdf] Error 1
I didn't spend too mu
Hello,
I get this error when making web on lilypond/translation branch:
./introduction.texi:1099: pdfTeX error (ext4): \pdfendlink ended up in
differen
t nesting level than \pdfstartlink.
\onepageout ...\ewbot \hfil \ewbot }}\egroup \fi }
}\advan
On Nov 7, 2007 8:48 AM, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Mark Knoop wrote:
> > This talk of 'reconsidering your notation' and 'reasonable shortest
> > notes' is rather disturbing. Clearly, composers *do* use 128th (and
> > shorter) notes, both beamed and unbeamed: therefore lilypond
Hi,
128th notes are specifically supported also in Braille Music although the
support is a bit clumsy and seems like an afterthought as it is represented
differently from other durations.
Regards,
Ralph
-
Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is a
Mark Knoop wrote:
This talk of 'reconsidering your notation' and 'reasonable shortest
notes' is rather disturbing. Clearly, composers *do* use 128th (and
shorter) notes, both beamed and unbeamed: therefore lilypond *should*
support them.
The musical notation should be chosen by the composer, no
Reinhold Kainhofer skrev:
Notes with n flags can always be composed by stacking more single flags on top
of each other, there does not necessarily have to be a glyph in the font for
this, right?
Hmm. This definitely does not hold for rests.
And we should imo allow for the same durations for r
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Han-Wen Nienhuys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> For unbeamed notes, we have to draw the line somewhere, and
>> it's at 64th right now. If someone can show a reasonable use
>> for 128th we
>> *might* consider it, but my initial reac
> -Original Message-
> From: Han-Wen Nienhuys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 10:05 AM
> To: Graham Percival
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: GPD: official shortest note in lilypond
>
>
>
Paco Vila wrote:
> If anybody has an edition of Beethoven's Sonata nº8 Op.13 Pathétique
> for piano, on measure 10 of the first movement (grave) there are some
> very, very short notes, guess what are they? 128th notes.
>
> see http://www.mutopiaproject.org/cgibin/piece-info.cgi?id=299
Ah, but th
14 matches
Mail list logo
