Graham Percival wrote Sunday, July 27, 2008 9:40 AM
Hi Trevor, Patick, Jonathan, Carl, Francisco, and Neil,
I'm now finished my thesis, course work, and everything I need to
get done until my thesis defense on Aug 19th.
That's really good - not many people have three weeks to spare!
It is difficult for me to answer a message like this. My English is
rather LilyPond-specific, and I cannot use adequately words as owe,
deserve and so on. I am sure that you know what I mean.
Maybe the best hommage I can do for you is to try, by all means, to
finish vocal.itely in three weeks.
2008/7/27 Han-Wen Nienhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Looks good to me.
You may want to change the default for windows.
I'm not quite sure how to achieve this; if there's a check for windows
which alters the option at runtime, how can a user override this
either in a .ly file or using the command
On 7/27/08, Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, GDP contributors!
Andrew: I know I asked you this a few days ago, but I've forgotten
already -- are we ready for the second draft? And do you have any
experience/interest in Winds? I don't have anybody down for that
section yet.
I
2008/7/27 Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Neil: having a specific technical help guy is *very* useful; as
I'm sure you've discovered, keeping up to date on all this is a
full-time (volunteer) job by itself. Please take a look at
technical-todo.txt on the GDP page, and copy all those
2008/7/28 Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Neil, are you willing to help when I have questions about how
things work? I can and have looked at source code to try to
find answers, but sometimes (well, actually, usually) it's too
opaque to help much. Docs that are wrong are worse than no
Hi everybody,
I've been trying to do a snippet for \put-adjacent in
define-markup-commands.scm, but it doesn't work using \markup because
there's no parser tag defined for the signature
MARKUP_HEAD_MARKUP0_SCM1_SCM2_MARKUP3.
I see three options as a solution to this:
1. extend the parser just
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:48:39 -0600
Andrew Hawryluk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/27/08, Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew: I know I asked you this a few days ago, but I've forgotten
already -- are we ready for the second draft? And do you have any
experience/interest in
Me too!
Graham, despite all the grumping, you've managed to pull off what none
of the previous maintainers/hackers managed to do: train a
disorganized band of users into a lean mean documentation machine. My
hat's off!
Many thanks for all the hours you put in, and we hope to see you
around from
