On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 00:22:54 -0300
Han-Wen Nienhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is probably the first release of lily that has more commits from
non-Han-Wen people, and I would be more than happy to delegate writing
release notes and (optionally) the 2.12 manual preface to anyone who
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote
Yesterday, I did another another bugfixing round (the results of which
are in .55). I'll probably do another one to resolve the
tie/completion-heads issues, but after that, I think we're ready for
2.12. I think this will happen within a month.
OK. I'll try to get
Hi Valentin
Thanks for the link. I tried it out, but unfortunately it does not work.
There are some minor bugs, such as first one needs to create a file
named lilyfix.sed, but in the script fix.sed is used. After
everything worked as it should, the output did not change at all. Here
is my
Thanks Mats. With that solution the output became different, indeed. It
now shows a bass clef...
But just a few minutes ago I found another solution, that is much
simpler and works:
http://www.cityinthesky.co.uk/pdf2svg.html
I would actually prefer it, if lilypond supported the svg
Isn't the answer to Neil's question to be found in the files used to
build the Windows installer.
In
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=blob;f=nsis/lilypond-prepost.nsh;h=05f6a2e199d1f35bb930c651679f337c28c0f6dc;hb=refs/heads/gub
you will see that LilyPond is called using
Hi Dscho,
[+lily-devel]
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Johannes Schindelin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyway, one of my pet-peeves with it was that it has too many
dependencies, and is really complex in its design (to debug some issue,
you have to follow through Python, C++ and Scheme code, for
Sold! to the grumpy gentleman in the corner!
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 5:03 AM, Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 00:22:54 -0300
Han-Wen Nienhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is probably the first release of lily that has more commits from
non-Han-Wen people, and I
There is also some code in lily.scm that checks for a windows system.
It's easier to add to there rather than the .nsh
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Mats Bengtsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't the answer to Neil's question to be found in the files used to build
the Windows installer.
In
I have the headers for flex (among other things) in a nonstandard
place, so I put the necessary -I flags in $CPPFLAGS. Some parts of
the build process don't seem to notice $CPPFLAGS, though. This is
needed for configure to find FlexLexer.h:
--- aclocal.m4~ 2008-07-24 23:33:34.0 -0400
Paul Jarc wrote:
I installed texlive from source, but I'm not familiar with managing
it. Does mf.base belong to lilypond or texlive, and how is it
normally created?
It's part of the MetaFont support and belongs to texlive. Unfortunately,
I have no
experience of texlive, but if it's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Could we maybe change the makefiles to run texi2pdf in quiet mode (-q),
because currently we get tens of thousands of progress output from texi2pdf,
mainly which files are included and the current page number.
Or is there a good reason to have
Neil (or anyone else who knows)
Here's my first question. It concerns the 'layer property. I'd assumed all
objects were placed in layer 0 by default, and objects which were processed
first were overwritten by objects processed later. To check this I tried
colouring bar lines white, and
Hi Trevor,
2008/8/5 Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Neil (or anyone else who knows)
Here's my first question. It concerns the 'layer property. I'd assumed all
objects were placed in layer 0 by default, and objects which were processed
first were overwritten by objects processed later.
Right, I've just tested your file using various \repeat unfold
settings, and each pdf has barlines under the stave at various points;
it seems you can't rely on BarLine always being printed over
StaffSymbol when they have the same 'layer setting.
Setting BarLine's layer to 1 reliably overwrites
2008/8/5 Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm surprised that nobody answered exactly this question. If you name your
main voice 1, then the upper voice of the {...} \\ {...} construct
will stay the same Voice context as the single voice.
That's true, it is explained in LM 3.2.1 I'm hearing
15 matches
Mail list logo
