Re: GUB / autoconf out-of-tree builds

Op dinsdag 23-06-2009 om 14:18 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham Percival: > 1) Do you think it's worth backporting to stable/2.12 ? (did you > add the RELEASE-COMMIT stuff to stable/2.12 ?) Yes, (no). > 2) Is there an easy way to build GUB from stable/2.12 instead of > HEAD? Once I've ma

Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question)

Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > I mean to have an automated set of tests, that checks for example that > > (eq? (split-at-predicate odd? '(2 3 6 8 9 0)) >'((2) (6 8) (0))) > > holds. It would be .ly file that runs Scheme function on a set of > inputs, and compares them to a set of outputs t

Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question)

On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Mark Polesky wrote: >> Maybe you guys can look into making a test framework for the >> Scheme library functions. >> >> It should be fairly simple to check the functions (like you do >> here ad-hoc) in a separate .scm file that is loaded if you run >> ly/test-scm-fu

Re: 2.13.2 release test

On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 12:15:50AM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > Am Dienstag, 23. Juni 2009 22:50:57 schrieb Graham Percival: > > I think I've managed to build with GUB. linux-x86 and darwin-x86 > > builds work ok for me. If somebody can test the mingw version, > > then I'll try making this

Re: 2.14 release plans

On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 12:02:12AM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Am Dienstag, 23. Juni 2009 06:25:20 schrieb Graham Percival: > > Progress has been slow for the past month. I'd like to be able to > > claim that I'll be getting more done in

Re: changing \version number in Welcome*.ly files

On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 09:35:34AM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote: > > Should we get in the habit of changing the \version numbers in > Welcome-to-LilyPond-MacOS.ly and Welcome-to-LilyPond.ly every time > the version is bumped? At least we should remember to do it after > we bump into 2.14.0 and before

Re: MacOS X 10.5 GUI

On 24.06.2009, at 01:28, Patrick McCarty wrote: On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote: Sorry, I didn't realize there were two error messages posted in that bug report. When I made the above change, this is the error message I see (in the GUI): 'import site' failed; use

Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?

On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 05:13:12PM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: > On 6/23/09 4:07 PM, "Neil Puttock" wrote: > > > Since the Dynamic_engraver is no longer used due to being replaced > > just over a year ago, I'd like to remove it completely. > > Shouldn't we do this by eliminating Dynamic_engra

Re: MacOS X 10.5 GUI

On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote: > > Sorry, I didn't realize there were two error messages posted in that > bug report.  When I made the above change, this is the error message I > see (in the GUI): > >  'import site' failed; use -v for traceback > Traceback (most recent call

Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?

On 6/23/09 4:07 PM, "Neil Puttock" wrote: > Hi everybody, > > Since the Dynamic_engraver is no longer used due to being replaced > just over a year ago, I'd like to remove it completely. > Shouldn't we do this by eliminating Dynamic_engraver and renaming New_dynamic_engraver to Dynamic_engr

Re: MacOS X 10.5 GUI

On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Graham > Percival wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:47:05PM +0200, James E. Bailey wrote: >>> >>> On 23.06.2009, at 21:57, Christian Hitz wrote: >>> >>>     So here is my second attempt. Download at >>> >>

Re: MacOS X 10.5 GUI

On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Graham Percival wrote: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:47:05PM +0200, James E. Bailey wrote: >> >> On 23.06.2009, at 21:57, Christian Hitz wrote: >> >>     So here is my second attempt. Download at >> >>     www.klarinett.li/LilyPond.zip >> >>     As before, the LilyPo

Re: 2.13.2 release test

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Dienstag, 23. Juni 2009 22:50:57 schrieb Graham Percival: > I think I've managed to build with GUB. linux-x86 and darwin-x86 > builds work ok for me. If somebody can test the mingw version, > then I'll try making this an official release on lilypo

Re: 2.13.2 release test

Graham Percival wrote Tuesday, June 23, 2009 9:50 PM I think I've managed to build with GUB. linux-x86 and darwin-x86 builds work ok for me. If somebody can test the mingw version, then I'll try making this an official release on lilypond.org mingw.exe downloaded and installed perfectly no

Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?

Hi everybody, Since the Dynamic_engraver is no longer used due to being replaced just over a year ago, I'd like to remove it completely. Any objections? Regards, Neil ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman

Re: 2.14 release plans

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Dienstag, 23. Juni 2009 06:25:20 schrieb Graham Percival: > Progress has been slow for the past month. I'd like to be able to > claim that I'll be getting more done in the next few weeks, but in > all honesty I doubt it. If anything, I'll be engag

Re: 2.13.2 release test

2009/6/23 Graham Percival : > I think I've managed to build with GUB.  linux-x86 and darwin-x86 > builds work ok for me.  If somebody can test the mingw version, > then I'll try making this an official release on lilypond.org The mingw version works for me, though it still suffers from font lookup

Re: GUB / autoconf out-of-tree builds

On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 09:42:02AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Op maandag 22-06-2009 om 15:16 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham > Percival: > > > I've attached the log file. I just don't know where this "ln" > > command is coming from! > > The local-dist target in stepmake/generic-targe

Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question)

Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > > I also took a look at the next procedure, > > split-list-by-separator. My revised version is below. Unless I > > hear otherwise, I'll send a patch soon. > > Maybe you guys can look into making a test framework for the > Scheme library functions. > > It should be fairly

Re: MacOS X 10.5 GUI

On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:47:05PM +0200, James E. Bailey wrote: > > On 23.06.2009, at 21:57, Christian Hitz wrote: > > So here is my second attempt. Download at > > www.klarinett.li/LilyPond.zip > > As before, the LilyPond binaries are not included so run > with: > > $ LIL

Re: new lilypond repos

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:41:41AM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Graham > Percival wrote: > > > macos-lilypad/    (new repo - question mark?  should it be > >     integrated with gub?) > > I would just leave this alone; it's not being developed, any effort > yo

2.13.2 release test

I think I've managed to build with GUB. linux-x86 and darwin-x86 builds work ok for me. If somebody can test the mingw version, then I'll try making this an official release on lilypond.org http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/rel/ (yes, that's an awesome way to distribute files. kainhofer doesn't a

Re: MacOS X 10.5 GUI

On 23.06.2009, at 21:57, Christian Hitz wrote: (cc'ing -user) Am 22.06.2009 um 01:50 schrieb Graham Percival: On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 02:02:15PM +0200, Christian Hitz wrote: I have made an attempt to rebuilt the Mac GUI for LilyPond on 10.5 (according to the instructions from http://www.mai

Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question)

On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Mark Polesky wrote: > > I also took a look at the next procedure, split-list-by-separator. > My revised version is below. Unless I hear otherwise, I'll send a > patch soon. Maybe you guys can look into making a test framework for the Scheme library functions. It s

Re: MacOS X 10.5 GUI

(cc'ing -user) Am 22.06.2009 um 01:50 schrieb Graham Percival: On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 02:02:15PM +0200, Christian Hitz wrote: I have made an attempt to rebuilt the Mac GUI for LilyPond on 10.5 (according to the instructions from http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-devel@gnu.org/msg12065.html

Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public

Here's a patch. I retained the definition styles: (define (split-at-predicate ... (define-public (split-list-by-separator ... I'd like to change certain other procedures from define to define-public (review this thread for more details), but I'll do that in a separate patch once this one gets ap

Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question)

I also took a look at the next procedure, split-list-by-separator. My revised version is below. Unless I hear otherwise, I'll send a patch soon. - Mark ;; current version (define-public (split-list-by-separator lst sep?) "(display (split-list-by-separator '(a b c / d e f / g) (lambda (x) (equ

Re: First release of ly/tablature.ly

Thanks, Joe. On 6/23/09 12:31 PM, "joenee...@gmail.com" wrote: > I don't know much about the issues here, but here's a review, fwiw. Of > course, you'll need to update the docs also (and a regression test or 2 > would be nice). Yep, docs and regressions are in the works. (Although Graham says

First release of ly/tablature.ly

I don't know much about the issues here, but here's a review, fwiw. Of course, you'll need to update the docs also (and a regression test or 2 would be nice). http://codereview.appspot.com/67174/diff/1/2 File ly/tablature.ly (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/67174/diff/1/2#newcode205 Line

Re: 2.14 release plans

On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 06:04:54PM +0300, Joe Neeman wrote: > On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 21:25 -0700, Graham Percival wrote: > > With that in mind, I think we're looking at 2.14 being at the end > > of July at the earliest. Therefore, I'd like to invite Joe to > > merge the new vertical spacing code in

Re: [PATCH]: -- Revised tablature implementation

Carl D. Sorensen byu.edu> writes: > > Please review Mark Hohl's patch for improved tablature. > > It's available at > > > This is a second request for feedback on Marc's patch. Tablature users are anxious for this to become part of LilyPond. Thanks,

Re: 2.14 release plans

Graham Percival percival-music.ca> writes: > > Progress has been slow for the past month. I'd like to be able to > claim that I'll be getting more done in the next few weeks, but in > all honesty I doubt it. If anything, I'll be engaged in *more* > household projects, not less. > > With that

changing \version number in Welcome*.ly files

Should we get in the habit of changing the \version numbers in Welcome-to-LilyPond-MacOS.ly and Welcome-to-LilyPond.ly every time the version is bumped? At least we should remember to do it after we bump into 2.14.0 and before we release 2.14.0. - Mark

Re: 2.14 release plans

On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 21:25 -0700, Graham Percival wrote: > Progress has been slow for the past month. I'd like to be able to > claim that I'll be getting more done in the next few weeks, but in > all honesty I doubt it. If anything, I'll be engaged in *more* > household projects, not less. > >

Re: GUB / autoconf out-of-tree builds

Op maandag 22-06-2009 om 15:16 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham Percival: > > RELEASE-COMMIT is not included in TOPDOC_TXT_FILES in master? > > That's what I don't get! TOPDOC_TXT_FILES is defined as > > TOPDOC_TXT_FILES = $(addprefix > $(top-build-dir)/Documentation/topdocs/$(outdir)/,$(a