Thanks Keith,
I think that the case you're talking about (<< e'32. \\ e'2>>) is a problem
with my code, which triggers stem raising for flags that fall on the right even
though these flags do note cause intersection problems. Is there a good way to
weed this out?
On Jan 13, 2011, at 1:03 AM,
Hi,
in note-collision.cc I read the following:
Direction d = UP;
do
{
vector &clashes (clash_groups[d]);
vector_sort (clashes, Note_column::shift_less);
}
while ((flip (&d)) != UP);
Uh, is there any reason not to just write
vector_sort (clash_groups[UP], Note_column
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 03:23:16 -0800, Mike Solomon wrote:
I think that the case you're talking about (<< e'32. \\ e'2>>) is a problem
with my code, which triggers stem raising for flags that fall on the right even though
these flags do note cause intersection problems. Is there a good way to
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> Have we ever done a regression test versus 2.12.3?
Depends what you mean. 2.13.0 (or maybe .1) had a regtest comparison
to 2.12.0. 2.13.1 had a regtest comparison to 2.13.0. etc.
We haven't done a recent-2.13 comparison to 2.12.3 because w
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 7:19 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> in note-collision.cc I read the following:
>
> Direction d = UP;
> do
>{
> vector &clashes (clash_groups[d]);
> vector_sort (clashes, Note_column::shift_less);
>}
> while ((flip (&d)) != UP);
>
> Uh, is there a
Hi,
looks like this mail was somehow overlooked. May i ask you to answer
the question posed by James - is the behaviour described below
intended?
2011/1/4 James Bailey
>
> On Dec 30, 2010, at 12:48 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > didn't find it in the tracker so i report:
> > optical
On 1/13/11 7:24 AM, "Janek Warchoł"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> looks like this mail was somehow overlooked. May i ask you to answer
> the question posed by James - is the behaviour described below
> intended?
I assume that the reason it hasn't been answered is because nobody knows.
But as notes are sque
W dniu 13 stycznia 2011 16:02 użytkownik Carl Sorensen
napisał:
> On 1/13/11 7:24 AM, "Janek Warchoł"
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> looks like this mail was somehow overlooked. May i ask you to answer
>> the question posed by James - is the behaviour described below
>> intended?
>
> I assume that the r
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:19 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> in note-collision.cc I read the following:
>
> Direction d = UP;
> do
> {
> vector &clashes (clash_groups[d]);
> vector_sort (clashes, Note_column::shift_less);
> }
> while ((flip (&d)) != UP);
>
> Uh, is there a
On 1/13/11 8:14 AM, "Janek Warchoł"
wrote:
> W dniu 13 stycznia 2011 16:02 użytkownik Carl Sorensen
> napisał:
>> On 1/13/11 7:24 AM, "Janek Warchoł"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> looks like this mail was somehow overlooked. May i ask you to answer
>>> the question posed by James - is the beha
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:19 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> in note-collision.cc I read the following:
>>
>> Direction d = UP;
>> do
>> {
>> vector &clashes (clash_groups[d]);
>> vector_sort (clashes, Note_column::shift_less);
>> }
>> whil
Hey Jan,
Please check out http://codereview.appspot.com/3928041/ for the most recent
version, which has a regtest.
Cheers,
MS
On Jan 13, 2011, at 12:49 PM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> [cc: lilypond-devel]
>
> This looks great, I don't see a regression test file; are you
> adding that please?
>
[cc: lilypond-devel]
This looks great, I don't see a regression test file; are you
adding that please?
Jan
Mike Solomon schreef op vr 07-01-2011 om 20:54 [-0500]:
> Kinda meh, but it gets the job done! I've included three patches,
> including the original.
> The second preserves the flat beams
On 13 Jan 2011, at 16:50, David Kastrup wrote:
Doesn't C++ have some more useful
idiom for iterators or so?
Then you'd have to write a function to apply. Below is an example; I
let you decide if it is more useful. :-)
Something like
for (d=UP;;d=DOWN) {
...
if (d == DOWN)
We've found a regression; I'll announce that the release candidate
is no good. Here's the issue:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1472
Do we have any volunteers to find the exact commit in which this
broke? Recently-rewritten instructions here:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Doc
Can't do it tonight, but assuming my Ubuntu VM can do this, I could do it
before tomorrow evening.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To:
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 6:15 PM
Subject: volunteers for commit-finding for a regression
We've found a regre
On 1/13/11 11:15 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> We've found a regression; I'll announce that the release candidate
> is no good. Here's the issue:
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1472
I think we've already identified the commit. It's the removal of
extra-spacing-height
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:24:06AM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> On 1/13/11 11:15 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>
> > We've found a regression; I'll announce that the release candidate
> > is no good. Here's the issue:
> > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1472
>
> I think we
On 1/13/11 11:56 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:24:06AM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> On 1/13/11 11:15 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>>
>>> We've found a regression; I'll announce that the release candidate
>>> is no good. Here's the issue:
>>> http://code.google
Hans Aberg writes:
> On 13 Jan 2011, at 16:50, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Doesn't C++ have some more useful
>> idiom for iterators or so?
>
> Then you'd have to write a function to apply. Below is an example; I
> let you decide if it is more useful. :-)
>
>> Something like
>>
>>for (d=UP;;d=DOWN
2011/1/13 Carl Sorensen :
> On 1/13/11 8:14 AM, "Janek Warchoł"
> wrote:
>> I'd say that instead of adding some space between notes that should be
>> put farther apart, some space can be substracted from between notes
>> that should be closer, and the result is the same.
>> There is plenty of spac
Graham Percival percival-music.ca> writes:
> Oh, ok. It would have been nice if somebody had added this to the
> issue tracker. I've added the patch there.
>
When the bug reports get immediate replies or questions, there is a tendency to
wait for the discussion to die down before opening a n
On 1/13/11 2:16 PM, "Janek Warchoł"
wrote:
>
> The distances are not equal. Optical corrections are made there.
>
OK, you got me interested so I spent some time I didn't have on this. I
must be a LilyPond addict.
It appears that the optical spacing *is* being added during note-spacing.cc.
I as
23 matches
Mail list logo
