Hello,
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
[mailto:lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On Behalf Of
Graham Percival
Sent: 01 February 2011 19:21
To: benko@gmail.com; percival.music...@gmail.com; pkx1...@gmail.com;
Graham Percival wrote Tuesday, February 01, 2011 9:28 PM
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 09:09:50PM -, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Any idea why my entry as contributor fails? It looks right.
If you mean why couldn't I edit that field, then I'd
double-check that you're logged in.
If you mean why
Am Mittwoch, 2. Februar 2011, um 06:49:14 schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
There is one diff remaining: see the attached file. I introduced
some streamlining of an inner loop, which affects the way we handle
beams that start/end with invisible stems.
The compare image is the new one. I have no
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:49 AM, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
There is one diff remaining: see the attached file. I introduced
some streamlining of an inner loop, which affects the way we handle
beams that start/end with invisible stems.
The compare image is the new one. I have no
Am Mittwoch, 2. Februar 2011, um 15:54:36 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys:
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:49 AM, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
There is one diff remaining: see the attached file. I introduced
some streamlining of an inner loop, which affects the way we handle
beams that start/end
Unless I hear complaints (or requests for more time), I will be
pushing these patches on:
Friday, 6pm GMT.
Fix melisma spacing (the infamous re-fix for 1120)
http://codereview.appspot.com/4095041/
Fix Issue 1035 -- Add context property for negative frets
http://codereview.appspot.com/3989049/diff/3002/Documentation/notation/ancient.itely#newcode966
Documentation/notation/ancient.itely:966: \[ d\longa
Can we put note durations for the first note of every new line (again as
per the CG)?
I'm afraid I don't get this. all first notes have
Thanks, that all looks good.
http://codereview.appspot.com/3989049/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Might it be worth having some predefined scales,
i.e. \diatonicScale and \pentatonicScale and the like?
I don't think so; they are not unique. Even a chromatic scale can be
written using many combinations of naming the enharmonically equivalent
notes. You might argue that a C major scale
hi James,
The CG asks that for every new line of music you put the note length
of the first note of every measure that starts a new line,
even though it is not technically needed.
That's all.
So for example
\override NoteHead #'style = #'blackpetrucci
a'8*4/3 a'
\override NoteHead
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Not quite on this list, but I would like to draw people's attention to:
some kind of beaming work
http://codereview.appspot.com/4022045
I don't know how this interacts (if at all) with Han-Wen's recent work
on
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 12:19:58PM +, James Lowe wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:17:46AM +, pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
Just some minor syntax changes to make it read better. I hope no one
is offended.
Not offended, but unfortunately I already pushed it. Could you make these
Benko,
-Original Message-
From: Benkő Pál [mailto:benko@gmail.com]
Sent: 02 February 2011 17:09
To: James Lowe
Cc: Graham Percival; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: regression tests for white mensural ligature enhancements
(issue3989049)
\longa is a duration; a'8\longa should
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 11:20:22AM +, tdanielsmu...@googlemail.com wrote:
Might it be worth having some predefined scales,
i.e. \diatonicScale and \pentatonicScale and the like?
I don't think so; they are not unique.
I'm not sure what you mean by this. For instance:
\majorScale c is
Benko,
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
[mailto:lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On Behalf Of
Benko Pál
Sent: 02 February 2011 16:22
To: Graham Percival
Cc: pkx1...@gmail.com; re...@codereview.appspotmail.com;
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 05:55:04PM +, Bernard Hurley wrote:
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 11:20:22AM +, tdanielsmu...@googlemail.com wrote:
Might it be worth having some predefined scales,
i.e. \diatonicScale and \pentatonicScale and the like?
I don't think so; they are not unique.
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 11:37:43AM -, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Graham Percival wrote Tuesday, February 01, 2011 9:28 PM
If you mean why can't I be set to be the owner of this issue,
then... I couldn't set it to you with the @googlemail part in
there, but when I took it out I could set it
Pal, could you do that git pull, then send me git format-patch
origin ? Now that we have James' approval, let's push your latest
patch.
attached; thanks!
p
0001-document-new-mensural-ligature-features.patch
Description: Binary data
___
BTW, the pages from Read and Stone that I quoted are up at:
http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/~reinhold/LilyPond/WholeNoteTremolo/
Thanks, I stay corrected.
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
LGTM.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4095041/diff/52002/lily/separation-item.cc
File lily/separation-item.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4095041/diff/52002/lily/separation-item.cc#newcode83
lily/separation-item.cc:83: double horizon_padding = robust_scm2double
(me-get_property
LGTM.
Just needs rebasing (I assume you don't want to delete
tablature-dot-placement.ly)
http://codereview.appspot.com/4056041/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Feb 2, 2011, at 12:43 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Not quite on this list, but I would like to draw people's attention to:
some kind of beaming work
http://codereview.appspot.com/4022045
I don't know how
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:26 AM, m...@apollinemike.com
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
The most recent patch set only has a single pass through beam quanting. I
don't believe it adds significant overhead to a score's compile time,
although I'd need someone to do some benchmarking to verify that.
Reviewers: ,
Message:
Please review.
Description:
Optimize beam scoring.
Use a priority queue of scores. This allows us to drop the arbitrary
reasonable_score threshold. On morgenlied.ly, this reduces the number
of scoring passes from 13.5k to 10.7k.
Please review this at
regtest is clean.
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:40 AM, hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
Reviewers: ,
Message:
Please review.
Description:
Optimize beam scoring.
Use a priority queue of scores. This allows us to drop the arbitrary
reasonable_score threshold. On morgenlied.ly, this reduces the
This works very nicely for me.
One tiny oops, and suggestions you can take or leave as you wish.
I think I understand the point that some scales *can* un-ambiguously
named, but a facility to generate scales from these names is not
necessary for this patch.
I can type
myPentatonic = \relative
On 2011/02/02 23:14:39, Neil Puttock wrote:
LGTM.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4095041/diff/52002/lily/separation-item.cc
File lily/separation-item.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4095041/diff/52002/lily/separation-item.cc#newcode83
lily/separation-item.cc:83: double
27 matches
Mail list logo
