Joe Neeman joenee...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu wrote:
You're right - it takes a long time :(
Perhaps it'd be wise to make a footnote switch that allows users
to opt-out of this slowness.
Better just to make
On Feb 23, 2011, at 2:19 AM, Joe Neeman wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu wrote:
On Feb 22, 2011, at 7:17 PM, joenee...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2011/02/22 15:23:00, MikeSol wrote:
On 2011/02/22 01:05:49, joeneeman wrote:
Have you checked the performance
New patch here : http://codereview.appspot.com/4213042
http://codereview.appspot.com/4167063/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hi,
should we participate in Google Summer of Code this year? (it's about
students from all over the world who work on Open Source projects
during summer holidays and Google pays them, website:
http://www.google-melange.com/)
DEADLINE of applicating: March 11.
What do you think?
cheers,
Janek
2011/2/23 Janek Warchoł lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com:
Hi,
should we participate in Google Summer of Code this year? (it's about
students from all over the world who work on Open Source projects
during summer holidays and Google pays them, website:
http://www.google-melange.com/)
Hello,
)-Original Message-
)From: lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
)[mailto:lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On
)Behalf Of Janek Warchol
)Sent: 23 February 2011 13:48
)To: Graham Percival; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
)Subject: Google Summer of Code
Am Mittwoch, 23. Februar 2011, um 11:39:22 schrieb Mike Solomon:
Unfortunately, in my tweaking, I got my git branch so distorted that it was
unsavable. I've thus had to make a new branch git cl made a new issue.
you can always explicitly assign an already existing issue to a new branch
using
Comparing 13.51 to 13.50 with the official regtest checker shows a plethora
of minor changes - clearly something in the spacing engine has changed
enough to flags lots of errors. I was looking at theses regtests as light
relief from my pixel comparator, which shows 277 changed images (from
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote in message
news:ik3fgn$ntp$1...@dough.gmane.org...
Comparing 13.51 to 13.50 with the official regtest checker shows a
plethora of minor changes - clearly something in the spacing engine has
changed enough to flags lots of errors. I was looking at theses
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote in message
news:ik3ha9$33v$1...@dough.gmane.org...
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote in message
news:ik3fgn$ntp$1...@dough.gmane.org...
Comparing 13.51 to 13.50 with the official regtest checker shows a
plethora of minor changes - clearly something in
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote in message
news:ik3ha9$33v$1...@dough.gmane.org...
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote in message
news:ik3fgn$ntp$1...@dough.gmane.org...
Comparing 13.51 to 13.50 with the official regtest checker shows a
plethora of minor changes - clearly something in
Phil Holmes mail at philholmes.net writes:
Comparing 13.51 to 13.50 with the official regtest checker shows a plethora
of minor changes - clearly something in the spacing engine has changed
enough to flags lots of errors.
Horizontal spacing changed for issue 1229. These all look good to
2011/2/23 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net:
Another change I don't understand.
Although I don't understand much about regtests, this difference could
show that printing order of objects in the same layer (with the same
value of the layer property) is indeterminate, therefore you could try
again
-- Forwarded message --
From: Vitaly Sazanovich vitaly.sazanov...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 2:29 PM
Subject: lilypond
To: han...@xs4all.nl
Hello Han-Wen,
I'm trying to figure out the best way to print music notes in Adobe
Flex (Flash) (both view and edit modes).
For
Hi Reinhold,
I don't think this should be added by default unless you're also going
to add a minimum-length setting.
Cheers,
Neil
http://codereview.appspot.com/4187054/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://codereview.appspot.com/4182056/diff/12001/Documentation/changes.tely
File Documentation/changes.tely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4182056/diff/12001/Documentation/changes.tely#newcode65
Documentation/changes.tely:65: New markup commands @code{\pattern} and
New patch with Neil's changes.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4182056/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu wrote:
On Feb 23, 2011, at 5:14 PM, joenee...@gmail.com wrote:
http://codereview.appspot.com/4213042/diff/2001/lily/constrained-breaking.cc
File lily/constrained-breaking.cc (right):
On 2011/02/23 04:23:44, Graham Percival wrote:
On 2011/02/09 09:37:16, Keith wrote:
I thought about making the @lilyponds above show this effect, but
[...]
I disagree. Please alter the above examples
Put differently, you agree more with my initial instinct.
New patch set is up.
Something good happened recently,
[lily@OHara dvorak]$ time lilypond M*.ly
GNU LilyPond 2.13.46
real34m1.356s
user33m7.193s
sys 0m4.798s
GNU LilyPond 2.13.52
real11m17.441s
user10m39.727s
sys 0m4.129s
Those timings were for the score of a four-movement symphony, and
Something good happened recently,
[lily@OHara dvorak]$ time lilypond M*.ly
GNU LilyPond 2.13.46
real34m1.356s
user33m7.193s
sys 0m4.798s
GNU LilyPond 2.13.52
real11m17.441s
user10m39.727s
sys 0m4.129s
Those timings were for the score of a four-movement symphony, and
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Joe Neeman joenee...@gmail.com wrote:
- SCM footnotes_ to Stencil,
- scm_gc_mark (footnotes_) to Stencil::mark_smob (for SCM garbage
collection)
- footnotes_ = scm_append (footnotes_, s.footnotes_)
to Stencil::add_stencil
- a scheme function
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Joe Neeman joenee...@gmail.com wrote:
- SCM footnotes_ to Stencil,
- scm_gc_mark (footnotes_) to Stencil::mark_smob (for SCM garbage
collection)
- footnotes_ = scm_append
On Feb 23, 2011, at 11:16 PM, Joe Neeman wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Joe Neeman joenee...@gmail.com wrote:
- SCM footnotes_ to Stencil,
- scm_gc_mark (footnotes_) to Stencil::mark_smob (for SCM
On 2011/02/22 12:15:31, Reinhold wrote:
http://codereview.appspot.com/4188056/diff/1003/Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely
File Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4188056/diff/1003/Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely#newcode852
On Feb 23, 2011, at 11:18 PM, Mike Solomon wrote:
On Feb 23, 2011, at 11:16 PM, Joe Neeman wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Joe Neeman joenee...@gmail.com wrote:
- SCM footnotes_ to Stencil,
-
Looks good!
Could you make one more version (changes below), then email me the
git format-patch origin
so I can push it?
http://codereview.appspot.com/4182056/diff/15002/Documentation/changes.tely
File Documentation/changes.tely (right):
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 05:18:05PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
TBH, there are so many changes on the official regtest page
(http://lilypond.org/test/v2.13.51-1/compare-v2.13.50-1/index.html)
that it's not feasible to do a good comparison.
I count approximately 150 changed regtests -- and don't
It's still not showy enough for me.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4149045/diff/9001/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely
File Documentation/notation/pitches.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4149045/diff/9001/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely#newcode2527
29 matches
Mail list logo
