It's still not showy enough for me.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4149045/diff/9001/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely
File Documentation/notation/pitches.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4149045/diff/9001/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely#newcode2527
Documentation/notation/pit
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 05:18:05PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
> TBH, there are so many changes on the official regtest page
> (http://lilypond.org/test/v2.13.51-1/compare-v2.13.50-1/index.html)
> that it's not feasible to do a good comparison.
I count approximately 150 changed regtests -- and don't
Looks good!
Could you make one more version (changes below), then email me the
git format-patch origin
so I can push it?
http://codereview.appspot.com/4182056/diff/15002/Documentation/changes.tely
File Documentation/changes.tely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4182056/diff/15002/Docum
On Feb 23, 2011, at 11:18 PM, Mike Solomon wrote:
> On Feb 23, 2011, at 11:16 PM, Joe Neeman wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Joe Neeman wrote:
>>
>> > - SCM footnotes_ to Stencil,
>> > - scm_gc_mark (footnotes_) to Ste
On 2011/02/22 12:15:31, Reinhold wrote:
http://codereview.appspot.com/4188056/diff/1003/Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely
File Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4188056/diff/1003/Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely#newcode852
Docum
On Feb 23, 2011, at 11:16 PM, Joe Neeman wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Joe Neeman wrote:
>
> > - SCM footnotes_ to Stencil,
> > - scm_gc_mark (footnotes_) to Stencil::mark_smob (for SCM garbage
> > collection)
> > - footno
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Joe Neeman wrote:
>
> > - SCM footnotes_ to Stencil,
> > - scm_gc_mark (footnotes_) to Stencil::mark_smob (for SCM garbage
> > collection)
> > - footnotes_ = scm_append (footnotes_, s.footnotes_)
> >
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Joe Neeman wrote:
> - SCM footnotes_ to Stencil,
> - scm_gc_mark (footnotes_) to Stencil::mark_smob (for SCM garbage
> collection)
> - footnotes_ = scm_append (footnotes_, s.footnotes_)
> to Stencil::add_stencil
> - a scheme function ly:stencil::make-footnote
Something good happened recently,
[lily@OHara dvorak]$ time lilypond M*.ly
GNU LilyPond 2.13.46
real34m1.356s
user33m7.193s
sys 0m4.798s
GNU LilyPond 2.13.52
real11m17.441s
user10m39.727s
sys 0m4.129s
Those timings were for the score of a four-movement symphony, and woul
Something good happened recently,
[lily@OHara dvorak]$ time lilypond M*.ly
GNU LilyPond 2.13.46
real34m1.356s
user33m7.193s
sys 0m4.798s
GNU LilyPond 2.13.52
real11m17.441s
user10m39.727s
sys 0m4.129s
Those timings were for the score of a four-movement symphony, and woul
On 2011/02/23 04:23:44, Graham Percival wrote:
On 2011/02/09 09:37:16, Keith wrote:
> I thought about making the @lilyponds above show this effect, but
> [...]
I disagree. Please alter the above examples
Put differently, you agree more with my initial instinct.
New patch set is up.
http://cod
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Mike Solomon wrote:
> On Feb 23, 2011, at 5:14 PM, joenee...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >
> >
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4213042/diff/2001/lily/constrained-breaking.cc
> > File lily/constrained-breaking.cc (right):
> >
> >
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4213042/d
New patch with Neil's changes.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4182056/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
http://codereview.appspot.com/4182056/diff/12001/Documentation/changes.tely
File Documentation/changes.tely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4182056/diff/12001/Documentation/changes.tely#newcode65
Documentation/changes.tely:65: New markup commands @code{\pattern} and
@code{\fill-with-patte
Hi Reinhold,
I don't think this should be added by default unless you're also going
to add a minimum-length setting.
Cheers,
Neil
http://codereview.appspot.com/4187054/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailm
-- Forwarded message --
From: Vitaly Sazanovich
Date: Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 2:29 PM
Subject: lilypond
To: han...@xs4all.nl
Hello Han-Wen,
I'm trying to figure out the best way to print music notes in Adobe
Flex (Flash) (both view and edit modes).
For this purpose I took the source
2011/2/23 Phil Holmes :
> Another change I don't understand.
Although I don't understand much about regtests, this difference could
show that printing order of objects in the same layer (with the same
value of the layer property) is indeterminate, therefore you could try
again and obtain a differe
Phil Holmes philholmes.net> writes:
>
> Comparing 13.51 to 13.50 with the official regtest checker shows a plethora
> of minor changes - clearly something in the spacing engine has changed
> enough to flags lots of errors.
Horizontal spacing changed for issue 1229. These all look good to me
"Phil Holmes" wrote in message
news:ik3ha9$33v$1...@dough.gmane.org...
"Phil Holmes" wrote in message
news:ik3fgn$ntp$1...@dough.gmane.org...
Comparing 13.51 to 13.50 with the official regtest checker shows a
plethora of minor changes - clearly something in the spacing engine has
changed enoug
"Phil Holmes" wrote in message
news:ik3ha9$33v$1...@dough.gmane.org...
"Phil Holmes" wrote in message
news:ik3fgn$ntp$1...@dough.gmane.org...
Comparing 13.51 to 13.50 with the official regtest checker shows a
plethora of minor changes - clearly something in the spacing engine has
changed enoug
"Phil Holmes" wrote in message
news:ik3fgn$ntp$1...@dough.gmane.org...
Comparing 13.51 to 13.50 with the official regtest checker shows a
plethora of minor changes - clearly something in the spacing engine has
changed enough to flags lots of errors. I was looking at theses regtests
as light r
Comparing 13.51 to 13.50 with the official regtest checker shows a plethora
of minor changes - clearly something in the spacing engine has changed
enough to flags lots of errors. I was looking at theses regtests as light
relief from my pixel comparator, which shows 277 changed images (from 13.4
Am Mittwoch, 23. Februar 2011, um 11:39:22 schrieb Mike Solomon:
> Unfortunately, in my tweaking, I got my git branch so distorted that it was
> unsavable. I've thus had to make a new branch & git cl made a new issue.
you can always explicitly assign an already existing issue to a new branch
usi
Hello,
)-Original Message-
)From: lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
)[mailto:lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On
)Behalf Of Janek Warchol
)Sent: 23 February 2011 13:48
)To: Graham Percival; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
)Subject: Google Summer of Code -
2011/2/23 Janek Warchoł :
> Hi,
>
> should we participate in Google Summer of Code this year? (it's about
> students from all over the world who work on Open Source projects
> during summer holidays and Google pays them, website:
> http://www.google-melange.com/)
> DEADLINE of applicating: March 11
Hi,
should we participate in Google Summer of Code this year? (it's about
students from all over the world who work on Open Source projects
during summer holidays and Google pays them, website:
http://www.google-melange.com/)
DEADLINE of applicating: March 11.
What do you think?
cheers,
Janek
__
New patch here : http://codereview.appspot.com/4213042
http://codereview.appspot.com/4167063/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Feb 23, 2011, at 2:19 AM, Joe Neeman wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Mike Solomon wrote:
> On Feb 22, 2011, at 7:17 PM, joenee...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > On 2011/02/22 15:23:00, MikeSol wrote:
>
> >> On 2011/02/22 01:05:49, joeneeman wrote:
> >> > Have you checked the performance of
Joe Neeman writes:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Mike Solomon wrote:
>
> You're right - it takes a long time :(
>
> Perhaps it'd be wise to make a footnote switch that allows users
> to opt-out of this slowness.
>
>
> Better just to make it faster :). What if you
29 matches
Mail list logo